Original source · versioned page text
2018-01-15 General Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (13.6 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 15 JANUARY 2018
The Code’s Overall Outcome includes provision for ‘lots avoid significant adverse effects on the
natural environment and landscape and minimise the risk of hazards for people and property’.
The proposed building envelopes range from 257m2 to 618m2, with an average size building
envelope of 494m2. The building envelopes are generally half the size of the lot. The lots contain
significant amounts of vegetation and building envelopes generally enable the landowner to
utilise the land to its greater extent with regard to building form. It would be expected that very
little of the vegetation within the proposed building envelopes will be retained. The applicant was
requested to address this issue at the information request stage, but declined to modify the
building envelopes.
Generally, the proposed building envelopes exceed the maximum building site cover of 50%
(ground floor) of the total site area required in the Eastern Beaches Locality code.
The following Specific outcomes of the Reconfiguring a Lot Code apply to this proposal.
Specific Outcome Probable Solutions Proposal
O19 Stormwater run-off is No solution provided The applicant has proposed to provide 100m 2
managed so as not to cause any bioretention basins for each individual
adverse impacts on the built or allotment. This proposal would require
natural environment including conditions ensuring an appropriate
changes in quality, quantity or Operational Works approval was sought that
location of stormwater ensured the water quality targets were
discharges. appropriately achieved, as well as covenants
placed over the basins to ensure individual lot
owners appropriately maintain the basins.
The expert geotechnical advice was that
drainage from the proposed subdivision could
rely on infiltration only. Geotechnical advice
provided for other sites along the eastern
beaches has indicated that coffee or other
floating rocks within the dunal system may
intersect concentrated water flows from the
hardstand areas and cause water to push out
the dune and cause scour. These other sites
have needed to install pipework that
discharges concentrated flows as low down
the dune slope as possible. A geotechnical
investigation to the presence of rocks within
this site would be able to give an indication if
this is required here to give a more realistic
understanding of any vegetation clearing
needed for installation of pipes for drainage
management in the event there are rock
floaters in the substrate.
O20 Filling or excavation only No prescribed Proposed excavation on site and filling results
occurs where it does not solution. in removal of vegetation that is mapped on
adversely impact on— Biodiversity Overlay maps.
a) watercourses, drainage lines
and wetlands; or
b) vegetation on land identified
on Biodiversity Overlay Maps
OM1.1-OM9.1; or
c) water levels on properties
elsewhere.
Page 61 of 135
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.