Original source · versioned page text
2018-01-15 General Committee Agenda
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (13.6 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 15 JANUARY 2018
Specific Outcome Probable Solutions Proposal
O21 Land development S21.1 The natural Proposal seeks to modify the site through cut
responds to the distinctive landform and and filling of the site and removal of existing
landscape character of the site landscape are not vegetation across most of the site. Proposed
by utilising the natural features of modified to modifications do not reflect the existing natural
the site, which include— accommodate the undulating character of the site.
a) watercourses and drainage development.
lines;
b) significant trees;
c) understorey vegetation;
d) rock outcrops; and
e) views
O22 Native vegetation, including S22.1 Buffers of Existing vegetation around eastern boundary
individual mature trees are existing native of site is to be removed. Minimal revegetation
retained, protected, maintained vegetation around site is proposed in this area.
and supplemented, with boundaries and
particular consideration given environmentally
to— sensitive areas are
a) roadsides; retained and
reinforced through
b) the amenity of adjoining land
additional planting;
uses; and
c)the protection of
environmentally sensitive areas.
O23 Buildings and other S23.1 All lots include It is likely that the northern lots will enable
structures do not have a a building envelope dwellings to protrude above the ridgeline and
significant adverse impact upon that enables buildings result in the unnecessary removal of
the visual amenity of surrounding and structures to be vegetation.
areas. sited so they do not—
a) protrude above
ridgelines; or
b) result in the
unnecessary removal
of vegetation from the
site.
Engineering Works
The bulk earthworks plan associated with the application indicates that the northern knoll that
currently supports the existing dwelling is to be excavated by 2 to 3 metres with the lower
sections of the site filled 1.0 to 2.0 metres as detailed in Figure 9 below. These earthworks
further demonstrate areas of existing vegetation that will be cleared along with extensive site
modifications.
Page 62 of 135
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.