Original source · versioned page text
2018-01-15 General Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (13.6 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 15 JANUARY 2018
Issues Comments
sources of noise are within the noise level criteria
referenced, i.e. the Environmental Protection (Noise)
Policy 2008 Acoustic Quality Objectives. Despite the
recorded levels being within the criteria used, the
report recognises that certain noise sources such as
cars on the gravel or doors closing, can be further
reduced through the removal of gravel surfaces and
improving the structure of the fence.
The report indicated noise levels were within the
criteria being used. However, it was also
acknowledged that in rural areas background noise
are generally at low levels. It is therefore considered
prudent that further analysis could be done on
probable noise levels if the suggested noise
management measures were undertaken. A
condition is recommended that requests the
applicant to submit further acoustic analysis with
regard to background noise creep.
Removing car parking from gravel areas (and the
reinstatement of the road reserve area currently
used for car parking), creating more on site car
parking and improving the fence will assist in this
regard.
The existing advertising device does not comply The current sign has a face of 4.47m 2 with the total
with the Advertising Devices Code – there are 3 text area of 1.8m 2. The total sign area is 0.5m 2
signs – the larger sign is greater than 4m 2. greater than stipulated in the Advertising Devices
Code.
The development will conditioned to comply with the
Code.
Concerned with the storage of chemicals Chemicals must be stored securely in accordance
(associated with the Salon use) – fire hazard or with work place health and safety requirements.
potential for break-ins for chemicals to be stolen to
produce illegal drugs. These problems should not
be a concern in a rural residential area.
Questions if Drainage and roadworks cost Any condition requiring the reinstatement of the road
ratepayers or owner. The owner currently utilises reserve will be the responsibility of the applicant.
an area in the road reserve for car parking.
No economic need for a salon. An economic need analysis was not requested from
the applicant as the proposed area is within an
existing building, is small scale and will cater to only
1 client at a time akin to a home based business.
The plans show 4 work stations for the Salon The applicant advised there will only be 1 employee
tenancy. Concerned that there could be up to 2-4 and 1 client at a time. The proposal will be
staff and up to 4 clients at any one time. conditioned as such.
The property owner (1 Kingsgate) does not Maintenance of a property is not a planning issue.
maintain the existing car park facility – there is The existing car park has been there for a number of
foliage build up resulting in water flows to property years. The upgrade of the existing car park and
next door. associated drainage as part of an operational works
approval will assist with this issue.
There are no revegetation plans submitted with the The reinstatement of the road reserve currently used
application. for car parking may be conditioned should the
proposal be supported. This will include landscaping
requirements and be lodged as part of an
Operational Works application to Council for
assessment.
Page 95 of 135
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.