Original source · versioned page text
2018-01-15 General Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (13.6 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 15 JANUARY 2018
Issues Comments
1 submission for conditional support:
Support the use provided: There are currently 5 car parks with the site off
- No parking allowed on Kingsgate Dr – the road Kingsgate Drive. A further 4 on site car parks are
is too narrow for cars parking on both sides of proposed.
the street, creating traffic hazard for cars and The approval will be conditioned to ensure there are
pedestrian. Offer more off street parking. This no takeaways orders taken after 8pm.
will solve the litter problem too. The applied for use is for a restaurant/café and
- Take away patrons only to reduce noise in salon only.
evenings (some parties have disturbed the No liquor license has been lodged. Council will be
peace). No operation after 9pm. notified and have the opportunity to comment if a
- Business only for food and no other retail use. license is applied for through liquor licensing.
- Do not allow it to be licensed.
59 submissions in support of the proposal:
The venue is valuable to the community as: Acknowledged - There are a large number of
- it provides a local venue and meeting place supportive submissions that have identified the
without having to drive to townships - able to importance of the venue to them.
walk to
- the use was established in response to need
- it is a convenient and fun meeting place
- it is a wonderful place with great food
- it is a ‘little gem in the hinterland’
- it has grown into a sustainable and viable
venue
- been part of the neighbourhood for many years
and would miss it
- more successful/compatible than a general
store
- Focal point for the neighbourhood and is
responsive to the site’s hinterland location and
setting.
The business has been operating for a long time Acknowledged - The proposal is within an existing
and the business was there when properties were building that has existing approval for a general
purchased. store but which has been operating as a
restaurant/café for a long time without complaint
until recently.
The Planning Scheme is too restrictive and does The rural settlement zone allows for a General Store
not reflect the current and future needs of the to operate on the site with dining for 10 persons on
community. this site and the sale of prepared food.
Do not agree there are adverse impacts such as The proposal has the potential to impact on
hours of operation, parking, traffic and late nights. resident’s amenity if not maintained at a small scale
The current use is not intrusive and there are no and appropriate mitigation measures applied.
impacts - The complaints received are unfounded.
Does not create noise and is not disruptive.
Pomona and Boreen Point have establishments These locations are not comparable with
that have dining with 10 or more seats (population Tinbeerwah, as Pomona is a township with a
same as Tinbeerwah). number of business and retail uses within a
distinctive main street. Boreen Point is a destination
with 2 small scale retail uses (yacht club and small
corner shop) to cater to the local community and
visitors. Tinbeerwah is not comparable to these
places.
Limited hours of operation minimise issues. The proposal may be conditioned appropriately
Page 96 of 135
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.