Skip to the record
Accept no substitutions.

Original source · versioned page text

Approved Plans - RAL22/0026

of 43

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Plans and drawings

This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).

Log in to see the plans as drawn
Sub Unit 1a - stops assessed as 18 degrees due to Sub Unit being located down slope relevant to the development area.
(Firelineintensity calculated using Flamesol modelling adopting forest as the rel evant vegetation type}

 

Vegetation Hazard Class 5 i
# wy

 

forest on residuals |] | i pane) iv

 

Sub Unit 1b - siope assessed as 24 degree due to Sub Unit being located cown slope relevant to the devel opment area.
(Fireline intensity calculated using Flamesol modelling adopting forest as the rel evant vegetation type)

 

Vegetation Hazard Class | >”
#

 

IVHC 24.1 - Acaciaopen
forest on residuals

 

Sub Unit 2 -

 

Vegetation Hazard Class
#

 

 

VHC 3.1- Notophyll vine
forest

 

 

 

i - Slope assessed as degrees due to Sub Unit being located downslope relevant to the development area
Sub Unit 3 -s 16 due to Sub Unit bei di i the devel
(Firetine intensity calculated using Flamesol modelling adopting woodland as therelevant vegetation ty pe)
Reambnea] -
Vegetation Hazard Class |
a

 

 

VHC 39.2 - Low to
moderate tree cover In a 8 47 16 3,515
built-up areas

 

 

Sub Unit 4 -siope assessed as 16 degrees due to Sub Unit being located downs! ope relevant to the development area
(Fireline intensity calculated using Flamesol modelling adopting woodland as the relevant vegetation type)

 

Vegetation Hazard Class

, ity"

 

 

 

VHC 40.4 - Continous low Tt ae fy [| ee lai |
[grass or tree cover ee : ee ie inate He

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

# From: Leonard, J., & Opie, K., (2017) Estimating the petential bushfire hazard of vegetation patches and corridors —
an enhancement of Queensland's methodology tor State-wide mapping of bushfire prone areas. CSIRO, Australia.
* From: Leonard, J., Newnham, G., Opie, K, and Blanchi, R. (2014) A new methodology for state-wide mapping of
bushfire prone areas in Queensland. CSIRO, Australia.

** Prone Type 3 — Low Hazard, in its remnant form (mature fuel loads assumed) as per Bushfire Resilient
Communities 2019 Sections 7.5.2& Figure 14.

a
LEGEND

THE SITE MEDIUM POTENTIAL BUSHFIRE INTENSITY
Lot 3 on RP131369

150m ASSESSMENT BUFFER L HIGH POTENTIAL BUSHFIRE INTENSITY

| LOW POTENTIAL BUSHFIRE INTENSITY |] VERY HIGH POTENTIAL BUSHFIRE INTENSITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

orth Coast
Environmental PO Box 9686 Pacific Paradiee, ow.460¢ | BUSHFIRE HAZARD ASSESSMENT BRETT HAGE SUB UNITS J001050 BFO2 A
SSIVICES ns Aaneos26sc85 | 86 BLACK MOUNTAIN RANGE ROAD, BLACK MOUNTAIN A a aie 4:3200 @ A3

‘corrieo-r sauzzttves, rae SOCUNENT WAY HOTEE COPED CR TRESMTTESIN NF FORM ORS ANT
Ness oany ORIN Broke HT MoUT IME ae T'ey SowEN ONES

(SUE DETALS ONE int
Log in to download the original file

Approved Plans - RAL22_0026.pdf · 8.2 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.