Council archive · source document
Response to Information Request - 5 April 2018 · 132007.12.8
Attached to the e-mail 132007.12.8 - Response to Information Request.
“Adamson Town Planning, specialising in providing higher order town planning advice”
With respect to (1) above, the Noosaville Medical and Professional Centre is a substantial
development which has operated from the site for many years. It is understood that the
development has operated without causing significant adverse traffic impacts off site during
this time.
The former approval on the site required the provision of 393 parking spaces with the
construction of the multi-level carpark on the land as part of development for ‘Building B’. The
approval was subsequently changed to remove the requirement for the construction of the
multi-level carpark and now requires 369 carparks to be provided in accordance with the
Judgement dated 3 February 2017.
The development proposal seeks to provide a two-level carpark and 675m² of office, partly
over the third level. This requires a total of 403 spaces to be provided at a rate of 1 space per
20m² of use area. This means the current proposal requires 10 additional carparking spaces
compared to the former approval, which required 393 carparking spaces. Consequently, the
proposed development is not likely to generate significant additional traffic movements when
compared to the former approval. This position is supported by TOD Consulting who has
provided some helpful advice about the development (refer Attachment 1).
With respect to part (2), the requirement for external works under conditions 65 and 66 were
imposed on 16 March 2010. At this time the proposed development required provision for 393
carparking spaces. These conditions remain current despite the current approval being
amended to provide 369 spaces. Subsequently, the applicant requested TOD Consulting
undertake a review of the works required by the approval. TOD Consulting has confirmed that
the works required by conditions 65 and 26 should be undertaken as soon as possible (refer
Attachment 1). It is noted that a development approval for operational work was obtained on
28 April 2010 (2009/538) for the external works, but this approval has now lapsed (refer
Attachment 2). Consequently, the applicant will reapply for an operational works approval as
soon as possible and undertake this work.
It is also noted that since these conditions have been imposed the applicant has entered into
an Infrastructure Agreement with the Council as part of the settlement for the recent appeal
lodged for the removal of the requirement for the multi-level carpark. This Infrastructure
Agreement required the applicant to pay $46,000 towards the upgrading of bus infrastructure
at the frontage in Goodchap Street (refer Attachment 3). It is suggested that this might have
some bearing on whether the additional bus indentation work on the northern side of
Goodchap Street is reasonably required in accordance with condition 66. Consequently, it is
requested that consideration be given to amending or deleting this condition.
It is also requested that condition 27 be amended to not require the splitter island within the
northern driveway. This work has also not been undertaken because most of the vehicles
leaving the carpark area fronting Goodchap Street turn right to exit directly onto Goodchap
Street. Otherwise these vehicles would have to turn left and drive around the development to
exit at the same location or the western exit. The provision of a splitter island at this location
2|Page
14006 – Noosaville Medical and Professional Centre, New Office and Carpark Structure
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Response to Information Request - 5 April 2018.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 257 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.