Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Original source · versioned page text

Swmp

of 32

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

       SUB1-Ex                                   0.287                                    50
       SUB1-Ex (<10% AEP)                         0.0*                                    -
       SUB1-Ex (5% AEP)                         0.047*                                    50
       SUB1-Ex (2% AEP)                         0.095*                                    50
       SUB1-Ex (1% AEP)                         0.138*                                    50
      * area factored based on flow rate for events greater than 10% AEP

      The increased imperviousness and changes to catchment areas associated with the
      development resulted in an increase in peak flows to the sites outlet as shown in Table 2-5.
      Mitigation will be required to ensure non-worsening downstream and satisfy the lawful point
      of discharge requirements.
      Table 2-5: Comparison of Peak Flows At Site Outlet (Existing Vs. Developed)

       Event AEP                     63.2%        50%        20%        10%         5%         2%     1%

       Existing (m3/s)                0.34        0.42       0.64           0.80   0.95        1.12   1.27
       Developed (m3/s)               0.41        0.49       0.72           0.88   1.05        1.25   1.41
       Change (m3/s)                  0.06        0.07       0.08           0.09   0.10        0.13   0.13



      2.1.4. Mitigation Scenario

      When comparing the peak flows in the existing and developed scenarios, increases in the
      peak discharge are predicted at the site outlet. A detention basin is proposed to attenuate
      peak flows discharging from the site to demonstrate non-worsening and meet the legal point
      of discharge requirements.
      All modelling parameters remain consistent between the developed and mitigated
      scenarios, with the addition of detention basins. The proposed basin structure details are
      summarised in Table 2-6 with Concept Engineering Drawings included in Appendix A.
      Table 2-6: Summary of Basin Structure Details

                                  Basin A1

           Elevation (RL)                    Storage (m3)

                   0                                0
                  0.1                              26
                  0.2                              55
                  0.3                              87
                  0.4                              123
                  0.5                              162
                  0.6                              205
                  0.7                              251
                  0.8                              301
                 0.87                              338




21-0166SMP01-V1 | Stormwater Management Plan | 25 Pavilion Street, Pomona                                    |7
Log in to download the original file

SWMP.pdf · 4.9 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.