07/2398 - Traffic report · 132007.2398

 

 

 

Table 2: Ultimate Trip Generation by Type

 

 

 

 

 

 

Type Number of Peak Hour Total Trips In/Out Split*
Units/Beds Trips per Unit AM (PM) AM (PM)
AM (PM)

Residential Care 120 0.2 (0.2) 24 (24) 73%/27%
Facility (52%/48%)

Apartments 38 0.29 11 (11) 45%/55%
(61%/39%)

Residential Lots 118 0.27 (0.47) 32 (55) 38%/62%
(61%/39%)

Total 276 ta 67 (90) 51%/49%
_ (59%6/41%)

 

 

“per ITE Trip Generation Manual — Senior ‘Adutt Housing

3.6 Trip Distribution

As discussed in Section 3.2, the proposed site layout is to provide two accesses: a main access
for residents from the end of Trading Post Road; and a second staff/service access from
Lamonts Road to the north. For the purposes of this analysis, however, it was conservatively
assumed that 100% of the daily generated traffic would access the site via the Trading Post
Road. This approach would provide a conservative estimate of the impacts of the development
on Trading Post Road. However, the volume of traffic that would access the site was assumed
to be minimal and would not significantly affect the traffic operations or the results of the
analysis.

It was assumed that 100% of the traffic would be destined to Elm Street via Pearsons Road as
there would appear to be no relevant destinations on Pearsons Road east of the proposed
development. At the intersection of Pearsons Road and Elm Street, both inbound and outbound
traffic was assumed to be distributed according to the directional split of existing traffic at the
intersection. -

The assigned generated traffic in 2009 (stage 1) and 2019 (ultimate) are illustrated on Figures B7
to B10.

  

www.mrcagney.com consultants in ttansportation.

 

3427-001(1)}-Final.doc: 04/12/07