07/2398 - Traffic report · 132007.2398

 

17

Elm N

 

 

Pearsons

 

 

 

 

Elms

Figure 5: Proposed Configuration of Pearsons Road and Elm Street

Table 7: 2009 Design Analysis - Elm Street / Pearsons Road intersections (with Right Tum
Lane from Elm Street)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Movement Volume Degree of Delay (s) 95" %lla Queue
Saturation ) | (m)
AM Peak Hour
Elm Street South (1) 208 0.11 0 0
Elm Street South (R) — 55 0.06 11.3 2
Pearsons Road East (L) 74 0.10 11.5 4
Pearsons Road East (R) 3 0.10 11.5 4
Elm Street North (L) 4 0.29 8.2 0
Elm Street North (1) | 546 0.29 : 0 0
PM Peak Hour
Elm Street South (1) 383 0.20 0 0°
Elm Street South (R) 67 0.06 9.9 2
Pearsons Road East (L) 43 0.07 11.4 2
Pearsons Road East (R) 9 "0.07 11.3 — 2
Elm Street North (L) 5 0.22 8.2 ‘0
Elm Street North (T) 397 0.22 0 0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note: Practical Maximum Degree of Saturation (%,) for unsignalised intersections is 0.80.

The analysis indicates that, in 2009, the intersection of Elm Street / Pearsons Road would
function at an acceptable degree of saturation during both the AM and PM peak hour periods
with the introduction of traffic generated by the proposed development.

 

3427-001(1} Final.doc: 04/12/07 ||”