Original source · versioned page text
2014-04-28 General Committee Meeting Agenda Pages 1-64
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 28 APRIL 2014
Page 13 of 200
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 28 APRIL 2014
S Hloydeonsyiin |
tecrewnectal amert
The community and business can be engaged in understanding and deciding on |
options for waste management improvement especially where there Is an additional
cost which would be imposed on the ratepayers. Residents are sometimes prepared
to pay for improved service if they understand the economic and environmental
benefits that will be achieved.
Behavioural change campaigns are often unsuccessful unless they are well resourced
and targeted. Community based social marketing techniques have been proven to be
successful in delivering behavioural change.
Education campaigns can be specifically aimed at the options that Council
determines are its priority. For example if Council wants to reduce the organic
stream to landfill this may become the initial focus of a comprehensive and cohesive
campaign. The “Love Food Hate Waste” successful campaign in the UK and in NSW
could be examined as a model.
The methods for funding education programs need to be examined, and their
respective implications. For example, should waste reduction education be partially
funded through the waste contractor, or from council revenue?
Possibilities should also be explored for collaboration at State Government and
regional levels to facilitate cost benefits through larger scale education programs
using media such as television, radio and publications.
2.1.1 Tasks
Identify and assess options to achieve improved waste avoidance and recycling
through community education and engagement. Options considered should draw on
models of successful community education and engagement campaigns both in
Australia and overseas.
2.2 Theme 2: Organic Waste
Identification and assessment of options for reduction of organic waste going to
landfill
Background: Green waste {i.e, garden materials) and food waste account for
approximately 50% {food waste: 27%; green waste: 22%) of the domestic waste
stream going to landfill In NC, No data Is presently available on the proportion of
commercial organic waste presently going to landfill.
Lloyd Consulting | Themes for Options Development a
Page 13 of 200See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.