Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Council archive · source document

Delegated Report - Code - Planning MCU24 0094 [As Published] · MCU24/0094

of 33

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Very large file (12.2 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

               Front setback
               Acceptable Outcome AO9.1 of the Low Density Residential Zone Code states:
               AO9.1 Buildings and structures have a setback of 6 metres from the road frontage, provided that
                     setback to one frontage may be reduced to 4.5 metres where the lot:
                          d.      has frontage to more than one road; and
                          e.      is less than 600m2 in area; or
                          f.      is less than 15 metres in width.
               The applicant is proposing a 5.3 metre setback to the entry awning (Figure 11) and as such does
               not comply with AO9.1of the Low Density Residential Zone Code. The proposal is therefore
               required to comply with corresponding Performance Outcome PO9 of the Low Density Residential
               Zone Code, which states:
               PO9        Buildings and structures are designed and sited to:
                          a.      provide a high level of amenity to users of the subject site and adjoining premises,
                                  including provision of visual and acoustic privacy and access to sunlight;
                          b.      not unreasonably obstruct views or cause overlooking of private open space or
                                  habitable areas of adjoining premises;
                          c.      provide adequate distance from adjoining land uses;
                          d.      preserve existing vegetation that will help buffer development;
                          e.      allow for space and landscaping to be provided between buildings including
                                  adequate area at ground level for landscaping with trees, shrubs and outdoor living;
                          f.      be consistent with the predominant character of the streetscape; and
                          g.      protect the natural character and avoid adverse impacts on ecologically important
                                  areas such as national parks, waterways and wetlands.

               Assessment
               The subject site falls away steeply from Ross Crescent and therefore the applicant proposes an
               entry gate house and stairs adjacent to the front property boundary leading to the lower level.

               The entry awning to Ross Crescent is set back approximately 5.3 metres and is approximately 9.6
               metres in length. The minor intrusion into the front set back is located within the middle of the
               frontage and does not impact on the amenity of adjoining premises. The set back of the awning is
               supported.




                                                                                                       Page 18 of 33

Document Set ID: 23561450
Version: 5, Version Date: 10/04/2025

Used in these records

About this file

File size
12.2 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Delegated Report - Code - Planning MCU24 0094 [As Published].pdf · 12.2 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.