Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Council archive · source document

05. Hales - Planning Report · OPW20/0118

of 43

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

PROJECT URBAN – 20152                                                                                 1 Jul 2020


 Performance Criteria                Acceptable Solution                            Comments
                                     b) if a relevant planning scheme standard      preventing access along the
                                         is more stringent than the standard in     foreshore.
                                         paragraph (a) – the relevant planning
                                         scheme standard, to the extent it is
                                         more stringent than the standard in
                                         paragraph (a);
                                     c) any other relevant planning scheme
                                     standard that is not inconsistent with the
                                     standards in paragraphs (a) and (b).

 Performance Criteria                Acceptable Solution                            Comments
 Public access – safety
 9.1 The location and design         Public access to State coastal land near the   Compliant.
 of prescribed tidal works           prescribed tidal works is consistent with
 does not adversely affect           each relevant planning scheme standard.        The proposed structure does
 the safety of members of                                                           not affect the safety of
 the public accessing State                                                         members     of     the public
 coastal land.                                                                      accessing the foreshores, as
                                                                                    there is no access along the
                                                                                    foreshore available.

 Performance Criteria            Acceptable Solution                             Comments
 Navigable access to, or egress from, lots that adjoin, or are in the immediate surroundings of, a lot connected
 to prescribed tidal works
 10.1 Prescribed tidal works The design and construction of the Compliant.
 that are for a private prescribed tidal work is consistent with the
 purpose do not adversely following standards:-                                  The proposed structure does
 affect navigable access to,          a) subject      to     paragraph    (b), not intrude within 3m of the
 or navigable egress from,                prescribed tidal works:-               extended side boundaries.
 any lot that adjoins, or is in       i)      for a lot connected to the
 the immediate surroundings                   works for which there is a The proposed new boundary
 of, a lot connected to                       water allocation area – are not wall structure is to be located
 prescribed tidal works.                      constructed outside the water across the full width of the
                                              allocation area; and               property however, it will not
                                      ii)     for a lot connected to works interfere with any navigable
                                              for which there is no water access to or from neighbouring
                                              allocation area – are no closer properties.
                                              than 1.5m to that lot’s side
                                              boundary or extended side
                                              boundary;
                                 b) if a relevant planning scheme standard
                                 is more stringent than the standard
                                 mentioned in paragraph (a) – the relevant
                                 planning scheme standard, to the extent it
                                 is more stringent than the standard
                                 mentioned in paragraph (a).


Development Assessment Report                                                                         Page 19 of 42
Operational Works
35 Mossman Court, Noosa Heads 4567

Used in these records

About this file

File size
2.0 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

05. Hales - Planning Report.pdf · 2.0 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.