Council archive · source document
05. Hales - Planning Report · OPW20/0118
PROJECT URBAN – 20152 1 Jul 2020
Performance Criteria Acceptable Solution Comments
Earthwork and Vegetation
clearing or disturbance is limited
to the smallest area of land
reasonably necessary for the
purpose;
b) any other relevant planning scheme
standard that is not inconsistent with
paragraph (a).
7.3 After the construction Land or vegetation affected by the Compliant.
of prescribed tidal works, prescribed tidal works is dealt with in a way
any land damaged or consistent with the following standards:- The top of the canal bank will
destabilized by, and any a) subject to paragraph (b):- be returned to its natural profile
vegetation damaged, i) land surfaces damaged or as part of the works.
destroyed or removed by, destabilised by the prescribed
the construction of the tidal works are restored an
works is rehabilitated. stabilised; and
ii) vegetation damaged,
destroyed or removed by
prescribed tidal works is
replaced with native
vegetation for the locality
within which the work is
located, to the extent it is
reasonably practicable to
replace the vegetation with
native vegetation;
b) if a relevant planning scheme standard
is more stringent than the standard
mentioned in paragraph (a) – the
relevant planning scheme standard, to
the extent it is more stringent than the
standard mentioned paragraph (a);
c) any other relevant planning scheme
standard that is not inconsistent with
the standards mentioned in
paragraphs (a) and (b).
Performance Criteria Acceptable Solution Comments
Public access – availability
8.1 Prescribed tidal works The design and construction of the Compliant
do not have a significant prescribed tidal work is consistent with:-
adverse effect on the a) subject to paragraph (b), prescribed There is no public access
availability of public access tidal works do not involve the erection permitted along the foreshore
to, along or across State or placement of any physical barrier in this location. The proposed
coastal land. preventing existing public access, structure does not involve the
along or across State coastal land near erection of any physical barrier
the works;
Development Assessment Report Page 18 of 42
Operational Works
35 Mossman Court, Noosa Heads 4567
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
05. Hales - Planning Report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.0 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.