Council archive · source document
IDAS Code responses · OPW15/0240
Attached to the e-mail OPW15/0240 - Operational Works Application.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________Callaghan and Toth Pty Ltd
other than an artificial waterway, is replaced with (a) subject to paragraph (b), vegetation damaged, destroyed or areas will be stabilised with grass and any
appropriate vegetation. removed by prescribed tidal work is replaced with native impacts to existing vegetation will be mitigated.
vegetation for the locality within which the work is located, to the extent On Lot 606 the disturbed areas (3m2) will be
it is reasonably practicable to replace the vegetation with replanted with Lomandra species and native
native vegetation; ginger species to stabilise the area and
(b) if a relevant planning scheme standard is more accommodate natural regeneration.
stringent than the standard mentioned in paragraph(a)—the relevant
planning scheme standard, to the extent it is more stringent
than the standard mentioned in paragraph (a);
(c) any other relevant planning scheme standard that is not
inconsistent with the standards mentioned in
paragraphs (a) and (b).
Public access—availability
8.1 Prescribed tidal work does not have a significant The design and construction of the prescribed tidal work is consistent Complies – work will not impede access to the
adverse effect on the availability of public access to with the following standards— foreshore at either Lot 3 N21847 or Lot 606
foreshores, including public access proposed in the (a) subject to paragraph (b), prescribed tidal work does not involve the SP195871. The park at Mossman Court will be
relevant planning scheme. erection or placement of any physical barrier preventing existing partly closed off the public access, but there will
access, along a public accessway, to the foreshores near the work; be access to Weyba Creek throughout the works.
(b) if a relevant planning scheme standard is more stringent than the The pathway on Lot 606 will also be open for
standard mentioned in paragraph (a)—the relevant planning scheme public access for the duration of works and allow
standard, to the extent it is more stringent than the standard mentioned access to foreshore of Weyba Creek.
in paragraph (a);
(c) any other relevant planning scheme standard that is not
inconsistent with the standards mentioned in paragraphs (a) and (b).
Public access—safety
9.1 The location and design of prescribed tidal work Public access to foreshores near the prescribed tidal work is consistent Complies – safety standards will in place during
does not adversely affect the safety of members of the with each relevant planning scheme standard. works.
public accessing the foreshores.
Navigable access to, or egress from, non-tidal work lots
10.1 Prescribed tidal work does not adversely affect The design and construction of the prescribed tidal work is consistent N/A
navigable access to, or navigable egress from, any non- with the following standards—
tidal work lot. (a) (a) subject to paragraph (b), if the lot connected to prescribed tidal
work (the connected lot) adjoins a non-tidal work lot, the work does
not extend past the connected lot’s side boundary, or extended side
boundary, adjoining the non-tidal work lot;
(b) if a relevant planning scheme standard is more stringent than the
standard mentioned in paragraph (a)—the relevant planning scheme
standard, to the extent it is more stringent than the standard mentioned
IDAS Code Responses_Rising Main Works_MossmanCourttoSerenityClose pg. 5
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
IDAS Code responses.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 388 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.