Original source · versioned page text
2015-03-03 Infrastructure & Services Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (12.2 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
INFRASTRUCTURE & SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 40 of 80
INFRASTRUCTURE & SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Asoher Review of the Cooroy Butter Factory Arts Centre Report | 5
Summary of approach
The overall approach to the review included a research, community consultation and
evaluation. The review adopted an iterative approach, comprising five main phases:
e Stage 1: Community Consultation and Identification of Options (August — December
2014)
e Stage 2: Desk research into what other communities in similar arts-related situations
were doing successfully and how this was being achieved (August — October 2014)
e Stage 3: Selection and analysis of community proposals (October — November 2014)
e Stage 4: Assessment of proposals, preparation of report and development of paper and
recommendations to council (December 2014 — January 2015) — Community Services
project team in discussion with d-sipher.
Review method
Council specified that the review consider and evaluate the Butter Factory history,
identification and analysis of potential operating models and consult with residents, local
artists, businesses, and community organisations.
Overall, over 150 community members and stakeholders contributed to the consultations. The
method included:
1. Design of a community consultation and engagement method supported by a
communication strategy and a risk assessment of potential sensitivities (council with
d-sipher input). Communications included media coverage in local newspapers and the
direct email distribution of invitations and information to community members on
council’s mailing lists.
2. Desk research —of community arts centres and other models used in similar venues
and communities and research into additional ideas for the future of the CBFAC (d-
sipher and council).
3. Community consultation and identification of initial options (council with d-sipher
input). Consultation and information included:
a. 27th August - a ‘launch presentation and ‘World Café’ workshop that included
information on the objectives of the review, and opportunity for questions and
contribution of ideas to specific questions
b. September to November - Your Say Noosa, an online discussion open to all
community members on Council’s website guided by information and questions
c. meetings with the Mill Board and local Cooroy community members
d. September to December meetings and workshops and with U3A, Noosa
Museum, the Cooroy Lower Mill Board (CLM Board) and the Centre for Ceramic
Excellence (CCE) proposers to further develop up these options proposed by
the community
e. 25 November - a public meeting and presentation by council of the process so
far, an overview of ideas received, the lead concepts being considered, the
review assessment model.
4. Analysis of all community input and desk research (council with d-sipher input)
5. Development of a model for assessing CBFAC options - based on a synthesis of the
literature, evaluation models and community feedback (d-sipher)
6. Refining options to a small number to develop and investigate in further detail
7. Development of options — meetings and workshops were held with some of the
proponents (d-sipher and Council officers)
8. Reporting to Council.
Page 40 of 80See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.