Original source · versioned page text
2015-03-03 Infrastructure & Services Committee Agenda
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (12.2 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
INFRASTRUCTURE & SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 44 of 80
INFRASTRUCTURE & SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
sicher Review of the Cooroy Butter Factory Arts Centre Report | 9
Assessment of the five lead concepts
To assist with evaluating the five proposed lead concepts for the CBFAC, d-sipher developed a
review assessment model based on a synthesis of existing models, the literature, evaluation
logic models and community feedback. The assessment model was refined with Council and
comprises six main areas of review, as shown in the diagram on the following page:
1. The concept
2. Organisation and governance
3. Resources required
4. Council policy priorities
5. Outcomes
6. Comparative assessment.
Figure1: Cooroy Butter Factory Review Assessment Model
1. The Concept 3. Resources required
Description of concept, vision or Resource Stream — e.g. volunteers | (To be developed later)
outcome and the proposer/s, \ 5 Short term Mid term Long term
SWOT analysis Income streamn— ee: Brent, Group/s are set u Group/s
: workshop revenue, rental income. Pi Pp
to manage the BF manage the BF
=e Existing BF facility — e.g. how well supported by with minimal
2. Organisation & Governance Bienen facility meet the proposal’s Council. support from
requirements? Council.
Orne Council Budget & Staff Resources — Venue and Venue and Programs /
ay e.g. funds for building maintenance, programs are: programs are activities are
support from staff. *contemporary viable. financially
Stee Lo relevant i
im hi = sustainable.
t . ‘! Council Capital Works Budget e.g. «supported by Hl
funds for building modifications to a
\ f t long term financial viability com Dieles cr
: SUPPLE i interest.
Sol co
4. Council policy priorities 6. Comparative assessment
How does this concept align How does this concept compare with other
with Council priorities? concepts proposed?
The review assessment model
1. The Concept
A description of the proposal, who is driving it, the vision or intended overall outcome and
Who is this for and who will benefit? What is the interest and demand for this concept? How
will the community benefit? How sustainable and financially feasible is this?
2. Organisation and Governance
This section looks at the strengths and weaknesses of the community group or the proposers
using the ‘7S Framework’ developed by McKinsey Consultants. The 7S applies a simple
checklist framework to assess structure, strategy, systems, skills, style, people/staff and
shared values. It provides a focus for thinking across all elements that need to be considered
now or in the future in regard to a group that may be involved with the CBFAC. The basic
assumption is that each area is dependent on the other and each area is important and all
Page 44 of 80See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.