Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Original source · versioned page text

MCU14/0106 & OPW15/0001 Appendix B - Retail Needs Response

of 35

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (10.5 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

The derived uplift of $149.6 million noted in the Information Request is the uplift relative to current
turnover in 2014 (i.e. $147 million). The difference of $30 million is due to the growth forecast over the
period 2014-2018, population growth (1.7% p.a.) and real spending growth (1.6% p.a). In other words,
the centre would be expected to experience natural growth over the pre-development period and this is
captured in the ‘do nothing’ forecast.

3 URBIS
20 neact anatysis NOOSA RESPONSE REPORT - RETAIL ECONOMICS JUNE 2015 V2
Log in to download the original file

MCU14_0106 & OPW15_0001 Appendix B - Retail Needs Response.pdf · 10.5 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.