Original source · versioned page text
2015-06-23 Infrastructure & Services Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
INFRASTRUCTURE & SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 23 JUNE 2015
Table 2.
Waste Service Requests January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015
by Type Received Completed Received Completed Received Completed Received Completed
Charges 7 8 7 6 6 3 10 17
Contractor 13 14 6 12 13 9 9 11
Damaged/Missed bin 177 179 147 147 161 161 128 128
Dog bags 3 2 2 2 1 1 0 3
Dumping – Garden Waste 1 3 0 1 2 0 0 2
Dumping >200Litres 17 22 9 6 25 13 12 26
Hazard/Contamination 2 1 3 4 0 0 5 5
Holding Tanks 5 2 4 2 4 3 7 15
Landfill/Transfer Station 2 0 1 2 0 0 3 4
Littering <200Litres 6 6 12 8 15 5 6 21
Service – Extra 71 71 17 17 27 27 34 34
Service – Missed 136 136 54 54 62 62 61 61
Service – Modify 36 38 27 27 22 19 17 21
Service – New 94 95 73 72 106 94 71 86
The high number of customer requests in January is typical of holiday season when
accommodation premises request changes to waste collection service entitlements or additional
services to cope with waste generation during these busy times.
Dumping >200 litres and Littering <200 litres refers to illegal dumping of waste in the open
environment. These typically take some time to obtain evidence and pursue offenders if sufficient
evidence exists, a time consuming but essential exercise. These requests are not closed off until
the offender is issued with an infringement notice or other action. They are only closed off when it
is impossible to identify or locate the offender.
A significant number of customer requests fall into the category of damaged/missed bin. On
many occasions a missed bin is not missed by the contractor, the owner has failed to present the
bin for collection by the required collection time. When a service request is this category is
received it is passed on to the contractor immediately and the request is automatically marked off
as completed. It is only on very rare occasions that the contractor fails to satisfy the request.
Automatically recording these requests as actioned saves a significant amount of administrative
time. If the requests were individually followed up additional staff resources would be required to
undertake this function.
A summary of the number of service requests outstanding for significant periods of time are
detailed below in Table 3.
Table 3.
Outstanding Waste Service Requests January February March April
2015 2015 2015 2015
Total Total Total Total
Request’s received during the month 570 362 444 363
Request’s completed during the month 577 360 397 434
Older than 30 days but less than 60 days 0 0 0 0
Older than 60 days but less than 90 days 0 0 0 0
More than 90 days old 0 0 0 0
Page 47 of 51
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.