Original source · versioned page text
NOOSA PLAN 2020 PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 2 - POST PUBLIC NOTIFICATION FOR FINAL STATE GOVERNMENT MINISTERIAL APPROVAL · Attachment 1 Table of submissions
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Original PDF page 112, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Your Say ECM Submitter comments Response Recommendation
Reference reference
already stressed, and increased housing density would exacerbate this problem, potentially causing
more severe flooding and damage to properties.
• Sewer Provision: The provision of sewer services across the site is another significant concern. The
existing sewer infrastructure may not be capable of handling the increased load from additional
dwellings, leading to potential overflows and environmental hazards.
• General Infrastructure: Without substantial upgrades to the stormwater and drainage systems, as well
as the provision of adequate sewer services, additional housing will only increase the strain on our
infrastructure, leading to more frequent and severe problems.
This not only affects current residents but also undermines the sustainability and liveability of the area for
future residents.
To address the need for affordable and diverse housing without compromising the value and functionality
of existing properties, Identify Other Suitable Areas: Explore other areas within the Noosa region that are
more suitable for high-density, low-cost housing. Areas with better infrastructure and fewer environmental
constraints should be prioritized.
Before implementing any zoning changes, it is crucial to develop and implement comprehensive traffic
management and infrastructure upgrade plans. These plans should include:
• Traffic Management Strategy: Develop a detailed traffic management strategy that addresses the
increased traffic flow and access issues on Poinciana Ave. This strategy should include potential
upgrades to roundabouts, improved signage, and safe pedestrian and cyclist pathways.
• Stormwater and Drainage Upgrades: Invest in significant upgrades to the stormwater and drainage
systems to address current issues and accommodate additional load from new developments. This
includes enhancing overland flow paths and ensuring adequate drainage capacity.
• Sewer Infrastructure: Ensure that sewer infrastructure is upgraded and expanded to handle increased
demand. This will prevent potential overflows and environmental hazards.
The proposed amendments raise significant concerns regarding property value, aesthetic and character
preservation, traffic congestion, and infrastructure strain. I strongly recommend that the Council
reconsiders the proposed changes for my property and explores alternative solutions that can achieve
the housing objectives without compromising the unique characteristics and liveability of Tewantin. By
maintaining key properties like mine, exploring other suitable areas for high-density housing, and
implementing comprehensive infrastructure plans, the Council can ensure a balanced and sustainable
approach to development.
23101845 I am fully supportive of the idea that more housing stock is needed to keep pace with growth as well as The submitter’s support for improved housing supply and choice is appreciated. That no change to proposed
the fact that the houses need to be able to be rented or purchased by essential workers at a price point An integrated traffic and landuse study is currently underway and is likely to make recommendations amendments be made as a result
that is within their reach. I appreciate that certain plan amendments are being proposed to meet the about certain roads and intersections. At times through the day the Poinciana Av / Sidoni St / Doonella of this submission
objectives of Noosa Council’s Housing Strategy and in that context my submission specifically references St route is indeed at saturation point.
Action 5.2.6 in the Housing Strategy viz:
Capacity planning for the planning scheme including the Local government Infrastructure Plan as well as
• Ensure growth in housing and population does not adversely impact on the character, lifestyle and UnityWater’s network service plan has factored in the highest level of development according to the
environment enjoyed by residents. zoning of the land and any hard constraints (such as flooding).
• Growth is consistent with the capacity to cater for traffic and carparking, water and sewerage and The allowable density of the Medium Density Residential zone is not actually increasing from the current
other infrastructure. level. However, it is intended to prevent underdevelopment of the land.
• Growth is not at the expense of sustainable care of the environment and management of waste. Tewantin has many character buildings however streets and neighbourhoods have been substantially
• Growth is sympathetic to the heritage and character of local communities. modified. The oldest parts of Tewantin are also those closest to the town centre, transport, employment,
the primary school etc where additional housing makes the most sense.
• Locality specific approaches are likely to be necessary
Central Tewantin is very well services by public transport and pathways and some residents may choose
My focus is on the changes proposed for the medium density area from Werin St to Memorial to minimise the use of a private car. It is well located in terms of all services including the primary school
Avenue which includes sites accessing Poinciana Avenue on which single dwellings are currently and a range of employment options.
based as well as the vacant land in Doonella Street.
The Lake Doonella and Noosa River water quality and riparian environments are of considerable
Since moving to Tewantin just under 4 years ago, we have personally witnessed the massive increase in importance and various measures within the planning scheme are directed at mitigating impacts on the
traffic flowing down Poinciana Avenue, particularly at peak times. The completed roundabout at waterways and bank stability.
Beckman’s Rd has not made any significant inroads into this problem and as the proposed Stage/s for
further work to create the Tewantin Bypass have no budget allocation to date, it is anticipated that this A significant portion of the Doonella Street Precinct is owned by the State, purchased for the purpose of
congestion will only worsen. We can cite examples of driving on occasions to Cooroy at peak hour and public housing, which they can build irrespective of what the planning scheme says.
seeing the traffic coming from Cooroy often banked as far back as Carramar. It usually takes us between
1 to 3 minutes to exit Werin St even out of peak times, something we did not experience when we first
moved here. Of course during peak times it is even worse. Traffic builds up closer to the Tewantin Village
and it is not uncommon to note the difficulty residents in Doonella St face exiting their homes as well as
the time taken for motorists to exit the car park behind the village in Doonella St.
Building multiple small dwellings in Doonella St with the attendant car parking provision will exacerbate
this issue and is not at all consistent with the capacity to cater for traffic and carparking. This is a major
issue and cannot be understated. Any increase in density will have significant impacts on all residents
without a major and innovative solution to traffic congestion. Recommend Council develop a traffic
management strategy that not only assesses the impacts of the proposed changes to medium density in
110
Table of Submissions made regarding Noosa Plan 2020 Proposed Amendment No. 2, 2024
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.