Original source · versioned page text
NOOSA PLAN 2020 PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 2 - POST PUBLIC NOTIFICATION FOR FINAL STATE GOVERNMENT MINISTERIAL APPROVAL · Attachment 1 Table of submissions
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Original PDF page 120, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Your Say ECM Submitter comments Response Recommendation
Reference reference
efforts will help ensure that the housing supply meets the actual needs of essential workers and is
practical for developers to implement.
Evidence and Information on Viability of Changes
The lack of detailed evidence and information continues to be a significant issue. Comprehensive viability
assessments are crucial for understanding the practical implications of the proposed changes and
ensuring they can be successfully implemented.
COMPREHENSIVE VIABILITY ASSESSMENTS The current examples provided in the Proposed
Amendments do not include sufficient detail on key aspects such as parking, waste management and
landscaping. These elements are critical for assessing the feasibility of the proposed changes and
ensuring that developments can meet the necessary standards.
PRACTICAL IMPLEMENTATION Without detailed examples and thorough assessments, it is difficult to
gauge the practical implications of the Proposed Amendments. Developers and stakeholders need clear,
comprehensive information to understand how the Proposed Amendments will work in practice and what
is required to comply with the new standards.
SPECIFIC EXAMPLES - SUNSHINE BEACH ROAD AND LANYANA WAY Council has provided images
and videos of proposed redevelopment between Sunshine Beach Road and Lanyana Way. While these
visual representations look appealing, they lack detailed information on critical elements such as car
parking, waste management, landscaped areas and private open space. The absence of clear plans
makes it difficult to assess how these aspects will be integrated into the development. There has been no
economic discussion or detailed plans provided to demonstrate the financial feasibility of these
developments. Without this information it is challenging to determine whether the proposed changes are
viable and sustainable in the long term.
STAKEHOLDER CONFIDENCE The absence of detailed evidence reduces confidence among
stakeholders, including developers, investors and the community. Clear, well-supported viability
assessments are essential for building trust and ensuring that the proposed changes are realistic and
achievable.
Recommendations
DETAILED VIABILITY STUDIES Conduct and provide detailed viability studies for all proposed changes
in the draft Noosa Plan. These studies should cover all critical aspects including parking, waste
management, landscaping and other relevant elements. Comprehensive examples should be provided
to illustrate how developments can meet the new standards.
TRANSPARENT INFORMATION SHARING Ensure that all viability studies and supporting evidence are
transparently shared with stakeholders. This includes making detailed reports and examples publicly
available for review and feedback.
REGULAR UPDATES AND REVIEWS Establish a process for regularly updating and reviewing the
viability studies based on feedback and practical experience. This ongoing assessment will help refine
the proposed changes and ensure that they remain practical and effective over time. (d) (e)
COLLABORATIVE APPROACH Engage with developers, urban planners and other stakeholders in
conducting viability studies. Collaborative efforts will ensure that the assessments are realistic and take
into account the practical challenges faced by those implementing the changes.
INTEGRATED PLANNING Ensure that viability studies consider the broader context of urban planning
and infrastructure development. This integrated approach will help align the proposed changes with other
planning initiatives and infrastructure projects, ensuring a cohesive and well-supported development
framework. This ongoing assessment will help
Having read the proposed Amendment No.2 to the Noosa Plan 2020 as well as Tony Wellington’s
submission, written on behalf of Noosa Parks Association Inc (NPA), I would like to provide the following
feedback:
I strongly support the proposed amendments to Noosa Shire’s planning scheme, especially those which
seek to support housing supply, choice, diversity and affordability by:
• Expanding housing choice by requiring and incentivising smaller, accessible, affordable dwellings, and
those premises built for permanent rental;
• Preventing further short-term accommodation in Medium and High Density Residential zones and key
centre zones;
• Re-zoning areas to increase opportunities for the construction of smaller dwellings and worker
accommodation; and
• Creating pathways for the development of social and affordable housing.
In addition, for the reasons given in the NPA submission, I respectfully request that Noosa Council:
• Investigate whether the Brisbane Council’s STA’s regulations would be applicable to Noosa, and
whether our council’s 6-year-old advice regarding existing use rights is still valid in light of Brisbane
Council’s present STA regulations;
• Re-investigate the ‘existing use’ legislation, to determine whether the previous legal advice (obtained
before 2020) is still correct;
118
Table of Submissions made regarding Noosa Plan 2020 Proposed Amendment No. 2, 2024
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.