Original source · versioned page text
NOOSA PLAN 2020 PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 2 - POST PUBLIC NOTIFICATION FOR FINAL STATE GOVERNMENT MINISTERIAL APPROVAL · Attachment 1 Table of submissions
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Original PDF page 121, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Your Say ECM Submitter comments Response Recommendation
Reference reference
• Liaise with other local government areas to work towards relevant, up-to-date solutions for controlling
STAs;
• Provide adequate resources for its local law department so that the monitoring and controlling of STAs
meets resident expectations;
• Consider further how to assess rural enterprises and how to rate these properties; and
• Act to prevent secondary dwellings becoming STAs by providing adequate resourcing for staff, for
continuous monitoring and ensuring compliance.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on this important amendment. I look forward to
clarification of the legislative issues and the hiring of sufficient staff to ensure greater compliance and
control, in the near future.
23109126 Precinct-Based Car Parking Solution – We would encourage Noosa Council to explore the establishment The submitter’s suggestions about carparking at Noosa Junction are noted and will be reviewed further. No change to the proposed
of a ‘precinct-based car parking solution’ through the enhancement of one of the several public cars within They are outside the scope of these current planning scheme amendments but are of relevance to the amendments be made as a result
Noosa Junction. It is commonly known that best practice urban design and place curation for high streets Parking Management Plan currently being prepared. A more holistic approach to car parking in Noosa of this submission.
tends to comprise of the following for car parking: Junction will need to be considered alongside other considerations for the future of Council owned car
• a precinct-based solution comprising of centralised parking nodes parking.
• parking that is:
a) easily found (visual)
b) easily understood (where, when, how much)
c) where availability is easily determined.
This precinct-based model delivers the highest quality pedestrian and friendly village high street retail
experience. As a result, this:
• maximises amenity to street-edge;
• provides opportunities and safety for unimpeded pedestrian flows (from vehicle crossovers and grade
changes);
• supports activated and continuous shop-fronts; and
• promotes provision for contiguous landscaping and alfresco dining.
5829045 I am concerned by the re-zoning of my street Bottlebrush Ave in the past few years. The building of 31 There is no change to the zoning at Bottlebrush as part of these amendments. In terms of building damage No change to the proposed
Bottlebrush completely damaged the structure of the hill and sand dune that our dwellings are built upon. it is the responsibility of the builder to ensure a dilapidation report is provided prior to the start of the amendments be made as a result
The street has proposals for many more multistorey unit blocks of this scale including 27 Bottlebrush next development to protect both parties, the builder and neighbour. Should there be any significant habitat of this submission.
to us. I am not against development and housing and progress in the street but I do not believe the trees on site, the Council through the assessment process can assess retaining the tree/s should it not
underground parking which excavation significantly damages the landscape and foundations of Noosa impede the building significantly, alternatively a condition of Council approval could ensure a suitably
hill. If developers are allowed to dig as deep as 31 Bottlebrush when the build on 27 Bottlebrush Ave, we qualified person is onsite to ensure relocation of any fauna.
will have foundation problems on our land at 29 Bottlebrush, no to mention up the hill. I would also like to
please for care for the wildlife at 27 Bottlebrush before any bulldozing occurs. Over the past 2 years we
have proof of many animal sightings including carpet pythons, goannas, whip snakes and most
importantly an echidna on site. We would like Noosa council to protect this wildlife before proposed
development takes place.
23147231 Noosa Heads Surf Life Saving Club is currently in prefeasibility stage considering redevelopment of the This submission does not address NP2020 proposed amendment No. 2 but is seeking a separate change No change to the proposed
existing building as the lifesaving functions are not able to be accommodated in the existing building due to the planning scheme. The requested change is reasonably significant and cannot be considered within amendments be made as a result
to limited space, the western wing is many decades old and has exceeded the asset life of the building these amendments but might be reviewed separately later. of this submission.
and the eastern wing constructed in 2008 requires major refurbishment.
On 19 January 2006 Noosa Council approved a redevelopment of the entire building that included three
levels and a basement carpark. Refer attached copy of plans associated with approval 2004/4078. This
proposed development was intended to accommodate the foreseeable functions of the NHLSLSC
however the previous development did not proceed on basis of NHLSLSC priorities at the time regarding
funding and instead a reduced scope was prepared that limited the redevelopment to the eastern wing
and a renovation of the western wing.
The Noosa Plan 2020 made a reduction to the allowable floor levels from 3 to 2 and reduced the building
height from 12m to 8m. It is anticipated that this change was made without reference to the previous long
term functional needs and development intentions as demonstrated in the earlier approval. The NHSLSC
seeks to have the NP2020 amended by reinstating previous floor level and height provisions allowing
development approval for 3 storeys and 12metres as this will allow the necessary spatial areas for the
building to serve its community function of surf lifesaving. Note that the additional spatial requirements
and request for reinstatement of the 3rd floor are specific to the needs of lifesaving, training and education
purposes, it does not include any increase on commercial space for the Supporters Club area.
23055061 Residents need a sustainable community with facilities for living such as healthcare, groceries, An integrated traffic and land use study is currently underway to identify the implications of the proposed No change to the proposed
neighbourhoods of permanent residents, access to cultural and leisure activity. amendments and upgrades required to the road and intersection network. Providing more housing in amendments be made as a result
Noosa Junction, Gympie Terrace and Hasting Street are commercial venues plagued by high rents and Noosa Junction will increased the activation of the centre and will have positive impacts on the local of this submission.
variations in tourist interest, hence the succession of failed business in these areas. economy and will help support local businesses in Noosa Junction. Noosa Junction is well located to
public transport and services and more affordable housing options will allow key workers to live near or
Parking in Noosa Junction, Gympie Terrace and Hasting Street is already at capacity and during visitor close to work therefore reducing impacts on the local traffic network.
season parking is non-existent. Noosa Junction accommodation would aggravate this situation. Every
119
Table of Submissions made regarding Noosa Plan 2020 Proposed Amendment No. 2, 2024
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.