Original source · versioned page text
NOOSA PLAN 2020 PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 2 - POST PUBLIC NOTIFICATION FOR FINAL STATE GOVERNMENT MINISTERIAL APPROVAL · Attachment 1 Table of submissions
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Original PDF page 14, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Your Say ECM Submitter comments Response Recommendation
Reference reference
The body corporate rates would be unreasonable if it were changed to medium density and would cause
financial burden to the owners of the property and create disharmony. It is my understanding that the
current Body Corporate has worked very hard to lift the profile of the resort – so that it attracts tourists
and workers for short stays.
Tourism Noosa has concerns about the rezoning of 3 Hilton Terrace, Tewantin – Noosa Lakes Resort,
from visitor accommodation to Medium Density Residential. Noosa Lakes Resort plays a critical role in
the matrix of accommodation options available for visitors. The proposed change to permanent
residential occupation would remove this essential offering, to the detriment of both the resort operator
and the existing visitors who utilise the property. This transition would not only disrupt the current tourism
infrastructure but also negatively impact the economic viability of the resort and reduce the variety of
lodging options that are essential for attracting a diverse range of visitors to Noosa. It is vital to maintain
Noosa Lakes Resort as part of Noosa’s visitor accommodation framework to ensure continued support
for the local tourism economy, the businesses, and locally employed residents of Noosa that rely on it.
1.5. 48 Noosa Drive and 2 Katharina Street, Noosa Heads
Your Say ECM Submitter comments Response Recommendation
Reference reference
5805293 To simply run a highlighter over a business that's taken 15 years and significant pain and debt to build, 48 Noosa Drive, Noosa Heads occupied by Nomads Backpackers and associated food and beverage That a change be made to the
and then rebuild after Covid is seriously unjust. Quite apart from the personal impact this would obviously space has a long history of visitor accommodation (motel then backpacker), despite being zoned proposed amendments to:
have on our employees & my family, this move would decimate the seasonal work force upon which just Residential Medium Density, then Attached Housing prior to being included in the Tourist Accommodation ▪ retain the proposed High
about all Noosa tourism & hospitality businesses depend. Zone since 2020. Density Residential zone on 48
You may think that you've got that covered by the fact that residential accommodation would be built, and The buildings onsite are aging and at some stage in the future are likely to be demolished with significant Noosa Drive, Noosa Heads;
they'd live there. If this is the theory, I'd like to see the research that backs that up. redevelopment potential, to 3 storeys in height. The current development and use of the site is and
considered underdeveloped and an inefficient use of the site in terms of built form and density. However, ▪ include additional consistent
We've been encouraging the owner to redevelop for years, with us as the cornerstone long term tenant. it is one of just a few sites that offer low-cost visitor accommodation for tourists as well as itinerant workers uses of low cost
What you'd do with this proposal is destroy that as an option for them and condemn us to years more in who may stay beyond 28 days at a time. accommodation (short-term
an old eyesore of a property instead of a new, purpose-built resort. It is acknowledged the last few years have been particularly difficult for the backpacker sector, but it has accommodation) where
It's a large parcel of land with multiple lots, so perhaps mixed use could be an option. Any new tourism improved. backpackers or motel, subject
accommodation building would undoubtedly be multi-level and therefore have a much smaller footprint, The current zone, (Tourist Accommodation) allows for a dwelling house on each of the 12 individual lots, to impact assessment, over a
leaving the remaining space available for residential accommodation. as accepted development. It allows short-term accommodation subject to code assessment and the uses maximum of 40% of the site
of Multiple Dwellings or Resort are both consistent, subject to impact assessment. Rooming area and subject to a
I assume you have data on the economic contribution our market makes to the region, and you would
accommodation is not consistent. masterplan.
know of the issues that occur when low cost accommodation is full in the town. I therefore can't fathom
why there would be a plan to eliminate around 50% of the young traveller accommodation available in Under the proposed High Density Residential zone as advertised, houses are inconsistent; multiple
Noosa. dwellings are code assessable, as is rooming accommodation. Short term accommodation is an
inconsistent use (notwithstanding existing use rights).
23109188 48 Noosa Drive houses Nomads Backpackers, a key tourist accommodation site for over 40 years. 2 This site is very close to a range of employment and services in Noosa Junction as well as public transport.
23109302 Katharina Street is currently used for holiday apartments. At a total size of close to 0.74ha it is a key site provides a significant opportunity for a mix of higher density
Both sites are ideally situated in Noosa Heads, providing easy access to essential amenities and and affordable residential dwellings for permanent residents and key workers.
attractions, including the transit centre, Noosa Main Beach, and the National Park, all within walking As with Halse Lodge the site is also ideally located to accommodate low cost tourist accommodation or
distance. itinerant workers who do not rely on private vehicles as it offers excellent access to natural attractions,
The 2006 Noosa Plan zoned the sites for attached dwellings, which was changed to Tourist employment, entertainment and public transport. Safe ingress and egress points are limited so
Accommodation in the 2020 Plan to better reflect their use. redevelopment of the site should minimise access points.
Tourism Impact: The proposed rezoning undermines the historical and economic significance of these Whilst 48 Noosa Dr Noosa Heads is a key significant site within proximity of services, transport and
sites in supporting Noosa's tourism industry. recreation, perfectly located to deliver considerable resident housing supply and worker accommodation,
Feasibility of Redevelopment: The proposed zoning restricts future redevelopment opportunities for it is also recognised that the site’s current use for low cost tourist accommodation is also important.
tourism-related uses, negatively impacting local businesses.
Land Value: The rezoning could lead to a reduction in land value due to the loss of potential for tourism- In this context, a reasonable outcome for the site (which includes 12 separate lots) is to have a mix of
related development. In essence down zoning. uses for both predominantly permanent residents and key workers, as well as low cost tourist
Recommendations: accommodation in the form of backpackers and motels over no more than 40% of the site. These
additional tourist accommodation uses will increase the flexibility of the site and would be subject to a
• Maintain the current Tourist Accommodation zoning for 48 Noosa Drive and 2 Katharina Street to
masterplan.
support the visitor economy and local businesses.
• Conduct a thorough economic impact assessment to evaluate the consequences of reducing tourist
accommodation, including potential land value reduction. The retention of the sites in the High Density Residential zone is critical, to establish the predominant use
of the site as residential and to ensure it is developed to its highest and best use and avoid each lot being
• Engage with property owners to understand the practical and economic feasibility of potential under-developed for a single dwelling house, allowed under the current Tourist Accommodation zone.
developments, ensuring informed and effective zoning decisions.
The Terrace at 2 Katharina Street is a substantial building with two storeys containing 6 units, above a
23108595 Preserve Key Properties with Tourism Potential: We have concerns regarding the rezoning of 2 Katharina level of carparking. Units are separately titled and predominantly occupied by residents. They are not
Street and 48 Noosa Drive (part), Noosa Heads. These sites are currently used as a hostel and zoned for contributing to tourist accommodation.
tourism accommodation. Their location near Noosa Junction, Hastings Street, and Main Beach makes Number 5 Katharina Street is a small complex of 4 dwellings, to the north of the existing backpackers and
them invaluable for future redevelopment as key tourism properties. The historical use and strategic opposite “The Terrace” at 2 Katharina Street. While it is appreciated submitters are concerned about 3
location of these sites offer incredible potential for enhancing Noosa's tourism infrastructure. Rezoning storey development, both the current Tourist Accommodation Zone and the proposed High Density
these areas to provide smaller dwellings and worker accommodation for permanent residents would Residential Zone allow for 3 storey redevelopment.
significantly undermine their potential and negatively impact the broader tourism sector. We urge the
12
Table of Submissions made regarding Noosa Plan 2020 Proposed Amendment No. 2, 2024
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.