Original source · versioned page text
NOOSA PLAN 2020 PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 2 - POST PUBLIC NOTIFICATION FOR FINAL STATE GOVERNMENT MINISTERIAL APPROVAL · Attachment 1 Table of submissions
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Original PDF page 15, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Your Say ECM Submitter comments Response Recommendation
Reference reference
Council to recognise the long-term benefits of maintaining these sites for tourism and to reconsider the There are existing 3 storey buildings in Katharina Street and other properties in the High Density
proposed rezoning. Residential Zone. While submitters’ concerns are acknowledged it is still considered appropriate that 2
Katharina Street be rezoned to High Density Residential.
23109190 Rezoning 48 Noosa Drive to high density for small dwellings would result in the loss of Nomads
Backpackers which provides accommodation for budget conscious travellers and backpackers. The For clarity, vacant Lots 85 and 109 (totalling 1,399m2 to the immediate north west of the backpackers) are
reduction in tourist accommodation will have a broader economic impact on Noosa Junction. Local not part of the proposed rezoning and would remain in the Medium Density Residential zone.
businesses, including retail and hospitality venues, depend on the steady stream of tourists the loss of
which will diminish the vibrancy and economic viability of Noosa Junction businesses. The rigid
requirement for 75% permanent accommodation reduces the flexibility for developers to respond to
market demands.
• Maintain the zoning of key tourism sites like 48 Noosa Drive as tourist accommodation. The importance
of these sites to the local economy and their role in attracting visitors to Noosa Junction cannot be
overstated. Preserving these sites will ensure continued support for local businesses and the broader
tourism industry.
• Allow for a variety of accommodation unit sizes from 35m2 to 90m2 to cater to different demographics
including families and groups. This flexibility will help ensure that the housing supply meets the diverse
needs of the community.
• Implement a more balanced zoning strategy that supports both permanent and tourist accommodation.
This could involve a more flexible requirement such as allowing 50-75% of the site to be allocated to
permanent accommodation based on specific community area needs and changing market conditions.
• Conduct a comprehensive impact assessment to evaluate the potential economic effects of reducing
tourist accommodation. This assessment should include feedback from local businesses, tourism
operators and other stakeholders to understand the broader implications on the local economy.
• Engage with key stakeholders, including local businesses, tourism operators and community groups,
to gather input and ensure that the rezoning plan addresses the needs of all affected parties.
Collaboration with these stakeholders can lead to more informed and effective zoning decisions.
23094931 Fully support redeveloping 2 Katharina St and 48 Noosa Drive to High Density housing especially for Support for the proposed amendment is noted That no change be made to
worker accommodation. proposed amendments as a
result of this submission
5772564 Our property adjoins the area being proposed for re zoning to allow high density housing at 48 Noosa The current building height allowance on 48 Noosa Dr is 3 storeys and under its current Tourist That no change be made to
Drive. Accommodation zone allows for a range of tourist related uses and accommodation up to 3 storeys. There proposed amendments as a
Whilst we understand the need for additional housing in the area, we are concerned the proposed change is no change proposed to the building height for these sites. result of this submission
could lead to a significant impact on our standard of living here in Noosa. Our main concern is impact on In terms of setbacks or separation between the neighbouring properties, the setbacks remain the same
our privacy from a three storey dwelling next door. as they are now, noting that the 3rd storey or any part of the building above 7.5 metres above natural
A three storey property would mean that, depending on the design of the building, we could have residents ground level is required to be setback further than a 2 storey building, which helps to maintain privacy.
having direct line of site in to our back yard and balcony areas - which would significantly change the way Matters of privacy and overlooking are to be addressed during the application stage and consistent with
we currently live our lives - we certainly wouldn't get the same enjoyment and feeling from using our back the provisions in Noosa Plan 2020. PO16 of the High Density Residential zone code specifically states
yard and/or balcony if people were looking directly down on us. It is also possible that the design may PO16
allow residents in the new dwelling to look directly in to our townhouse windows - meaning we would have Development:
to keep the window shades drawn all day, adding to electricity usage and an impact on the environment.
The commentary around allowing additional building area if affordable housing criteria are met is a little 1. provides a high level of residential amenity to users of the subject site; and
concerning. We don't completely understand the ramifications, but would this allow the developer to build
closer to the fence line thereby further impinging on our privacy? 2. does not unreasonably impact on the amenity enjoyed by users of adjoining or nearby premises,
including privacy and access to sunlight.
All other dwellings on Katharina Street are two story - it feels odd that you would allow a three storey
dwelling at the end of the street - certainly not in keeping with the area immediately surrounding it.
The privacy and "feel" of our townhouse was a significant contributing factor as to why we purchased the
property and is a key element in allowing us to enjoy living in Noosa. We ask that you please keep in mind
the quality of life for those already in Noosa, paying rates, contributing to the economy and community
when considering future development applications.
1.6. 2 Halse Lane, Noosa Heads - Halse Lodge
Your Say ECM Submitter comments Response Recommendation
Reference reference
23108801 Regarding Halse Lodge, owners submit: An on-site assessment was undertaken confirming the extent of vegetation and creek embankments That a change be made to the
1. Realignment of the Tourist Accommodation Zone and Biodiversity Overlay, and Changes to the which identified the proposed zone alignments to be correct reflecting on ground vegetation and riparian proposed amendments in
Environment and Conservation Management Zone: corridor relation to 2 Halse Lane, Halse
It is considered appropriate to make changes to the proposed amendments to clarify that Low Cost Lodge, Noosa Heads to:
• The introduction of a riparian buffer should be based on thorough on-the-ground assessments and is
in line with the planning scheme policies on Ecological assessment guidelines (SC6.4). Accommodation in the form of short term accommodation includes both backpackers and motel style ▪ amend to clarify "low cost
accommodation, which are by nature low cost accommodation types. accommodation" as being
• Higher quality mapping and detailed materials are necessary to accurately assess the impacts of the short-term accommodation
realignment on existing structures and features. It is considered appropriate to make changes to the proposed amendments to make rooming
accommodation and backpackers accommodation code assessment only where within existing building. that includes backpackers
13
Table of Submissions made regarding Noosa Plan 2020 Proposed Amendment No. 2, 2024
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.