Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Council archive · source document

08/0176 - Response to Information Request [As Published] · 132008.176

of 77

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Very large file (28.5 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.

@ Page2

e Restaurant

These uses are integral to the operation of a resort of this size.

Htem 3: Details of staffing requirements, floor areas and capacity of uses in central facilities.

Applicants Response: Pages 27, 28 and 29 of the DB/ Request for information detail floor areas of the
Central Facilities Building.

ftem 4: Provide carparking and traffic generation report.
Applicants Response: A traffic report prepared by Dianne Hayes Traffic Engineer is attached.

ttem 5: A site survey indicating building footprints.
Applicants Response: DB/ Request for information details the building footprint of the development.

item 6: An amended site plan indicating area of vegetation to be retained on Lot 10.
Applicants Response: A triangular portion of Lot 10 located adjacent to the pathway and service area is
proposed to be enhanced with native vegetation. Due to the works involved and location of pathways
internal and external to the site the area is relatively isolated and separate from the park area.

The applicant also notes that the tennis court area which were previously approved for clearing are to be
revegetated with endemic species.

\Vtem 7: Details indicating the extent of filling along the southwestem boundary.
Applicants Response: DB/ Request for information details the extent of filling and landscaped treatment.

Item 8: Confirmation that tennis courts not proposed.

Applicants Response: Tennis courts are not proposed to be constructed as part of this development
application.

Item 9: Building elevations with RLs to roof lines
Applicants Response: DBI/ Request for information details the RLs of the development.

tem 10: Confirmation that development does not exceed height in metres.

Applicants Response: The architect has advised that the proposal does not exceed height requirements.
The applicant is willing to accept a condition in this regard.

Item 11: Amend colour palate to use muted natural tones.

Applicants Response: DBS/ Request for information details the amended colour palate which details
muted natural tones.

Item 12: Whitten details of disabled access provisions.

Applicants Response: DB/ Request for information details disabled access provisions. The plans indicate
pathways across the site and demonstrates that a large number of ground floor units are accessible for
disabled persons.

item 13: Demonstrate sufficient disabled parking spaces.
Applicants Response: Refer DB/ Request for Information.

Used in these records

About this file

File size
28.5 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

08_0176 - Response to Information Request [As Published].pdf · 28.5 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.