10/0627 M2358 Planning Report.pdf [As Published] · 152010.627

 

Concurrence agency response
Integrated Planning Act 1997 ss3.3,16 and 3.3.18

   
 

  
    
     
  

Applicant: Scanlon Property Group
. C/. PMM Group Pty Ltd A:
POBox 1559
FORTITUDE VALLEY QLD 4006 ~ RECEIVED
Application no.: 2007/1259. : ~ 1 AUG 2007
Date received by EPA: 17 July 2007 NOOSA
Jurisdiction: Environmental Protection Act 1994. Sait GOUNGIL
‘Role: : Concurrence .
Description: Material Change of Use &

215, 215A, 217 & 219 David Low Way; PEREGIAN E

Lotito: 8 Registered Plan no.: RP931S
Lotno.: 9 Registered Plan no.: RP9315
Lotno: 10 Registered Plan no: RP9315
Lotno.:76 Registered Plan no.: MCH2969

1 Type of development

Ms Material change of use : .

“oO Reconfiguration of a Lot ,
where: ‘ / , .
Ct the existing use of the land is, or if the land is vacant land with no existing use the most
tecent use of the land was, for a notifiable activity under the Environmental Protection Act’ -
1994, . , . ‘ .
_o the proposed use of the land is for child care, educational, ‘recreatiorial, residential or
similar purposes and the existing use-of the.land is, or if the land is vacant land with no
-existing use the most recent use of the land was, for an industrial activity. .

Oo the land is on the Environmental Management Register or Contaminated Land Register
under the Environmental Protection Act 1994.

a the land is wholly or partly within an area for which an Area Management Advice for:
industrial activity or natural mineralisation has been issued and the proposed use of the-
land is for child care, educational, recreational, residential or similar purposes. ‘

1 the land is wholly or'partly in an area-for which an Area Management Advice for

unexploded ordnance (UXO) has been issued,

2 Response to development application / :
The Environmental Protection Agency (BPA), acting as a concurrence agency under the Integrated
Planning Act 1997, provides the following response 't6 the application detailed above -
conditions must attdch to any approval of the development ‘
” any approval must be for part only of the development
any approval must be a preliminary approval only
there are no concurrence agency requirements -
the application must be refused

OoooRn

3 Reasons for including condition(s) or refusal .

The site (the subject lot/s) is part of an area of land within which the Department of Defence’:

efence) has assessed a ‘substantial’ risk of residual UXO contamination exists. Visit the Defence
: .defence.gov.anfuxo for details. ‘

   

  

VER2