Original source · versioned page text
2015-07-21 Planning & Organisation Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 21 JULY 2015
Code Discussion
Conditions are recommended for the development to be finished with
suitable muted tones, no lights to be attached and existing vegetation to
be kept around the perimeter of the lease area, which would assist in
screening the tower.
Overlay Provisions
The following overlay codes are applicable to this application:
Natural Hazards Overlay (Medium Bushfire & Landslide Hazard Area)
The proposed development is a non-habitable structure, which will not result in an increase in the
number of people living, working or congregating in the mapped bushfire or landslide hazard
areas, thus meeting the outcomes of the Natural Hazards Overlay.
4. CONSULTATION
4.1. IDAS Referral Agencies
The application was referred to the following IDAS Referral Agencies:
Advice
Powerlink Queensland is an advice agency for development because part of the premises is
subject to an electricity easement. On the 15 May 2015, the agency indicated that they have no
objection to the proposed development.
4.2. Other Referrals
Nil.
4.3. Public Notification
The application was publicly notified for 15 business days in accordance with the Sustainable
Planning Act 2009. Three (3) properly made submissions were received, with 2 submissions
objecting and 1 in support of the application. The following table provides a summary and
assessment of the issues raised by the objecting submitters.
Issues Comments
Electromagnetic radiation from the tower will The summary indicates the proposed tower will emit a
cause cancer. maximum EME level from the tower, which is 0.071% of
the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety
Agency’s (ARPANSA) regulated acceptable maximum
radiation public exposure limits.
The value of adjoining properties will be The assessment finds the proposal will not significantly
reduced. impact on the existing visual amenity of the area.
The application material and public notification The applicant met the requirements for a properly made
was misleading. application (including appropriate lot descriptions and
plans) and public notification requirements (including
signage along Schreibers Rd and letters to all adjoining
neighbours) as described by the Sustainable Planning
Act 2009.
Strategic sites should be identified and zoned The current round of planning scheme amendments do
for towers as opposed to the ad-hoc not propose to change the zoning of any properties for
development application and site selection such networks.
process. The applicant indicates they have a number of
framework agreements with third party mobile network
operators which outlines the process and procedures in
relation to co-location on NBN Co’s network
infrastructure sites. The 41m high tower has the
potential to include other operators to avoid the
proliferation of towers.
Page 56 of 140
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.