Original source · versioned page text
24110095-TGS 25-SA_TT-JHG-Lake Macdonald Dr_Lake Macdonald-R0
Client: John Holland Group Location: Lake Macdonald Drive, Lake Macdonald
Road Type Two Way Plan Number: JHG-25LV-24110095 Speed Zone 80 km/h
RISK ASSESSMENT
RISK RATING
Elimination
Work not to commence - review
16-25 Extreme
control measures immediately.
Safety/Environmental Safety/Environmental
Safety Consequence of Risk:
Substitution Likelihood of Risk: Hierarchy of Control:
Senior supervisory management to
S5 - Catastrophic 1. Elimination ensure all controls are in place work
S4 - Major
Engineering 5 - Almost Certain S3 - Moderate
commences. Strict monitoring of
2. Substitution 10-15 High control measures. Work shall be
Controls S2 - Minor conducted with supervision and or
4 - Likely S1 - Insignificant 3. Separate co-worker i.e. person involved with
Administrative activity must not work alone.
Controls 3 - Moderate Environmental Consequence
4. Engineering,
of Risk:
Design/Redesign Responsibilities must be defined
2 - Unlikely E5 - Disaster and understood by those involved
PPE 5-9 Medium
E4 - Environmental Harm 5. Administration, Training before commencing work. Minimal
1 - Rare E3 - Environmental Nuisance supervision required.
E2 - Insignificant Effect 6. PPE, Environmental
E1 - Day to day Issue Controls 1-4 Low Control by routine measures.
CONSEQUENCES
LIKELIHOOD
S5- CATASTROPHIC / E5- DISASTER S4- MAJOR / E4- ENVIRONMENTAL HARM S3- MODERATE / E3- ENVIRONMENTAL NUISANCE S2- MINOR / E2- INSIGNIFICANT EFFECT S1- INSIGNIFICANT / E1-DAY TO DAY ISSUE
5 - ALMOST CERTAIN 25 20 15 10 5
4 - LIKELY 20 16 12 8 4
3 - MODERATE 15 12 9 6 3
2 - UNLIKELY 10 8 6 4 2
1 - RARE 5 4 3 2 1
Potential Risk Initial Risk Control Measures Revised Risk Actions
Source Event Risk Evaluation Likelihood Consequence Rating Options Likelihood Consequence Rating Who What
Specifications / Standards / Practices
Clarity of applicable 1. John 1. Copies of relevant Document onsite
specifications, Application of incorrect or expired 1. Reference Library available holding ALL Holland 2. Ensure that T GS is drafted to
standards, rules and specifications, standards, rules and current versions of the COP, MUT CD, Group required standards
policies including 3. Ensure that Signs and Devices are
policies leads to confusion regarding AGT T M, QGGT M
Present at this installed as per the T GS review
conflict between mandatory safety regulations leading Moderate Major High 2.Records of Client Requests Unlikely Major Medium 2. T MD
location relevant documentation prior to
requirements from to inconsistent application and 3.Review of all documentation Prior to commencing shift
RIM / PCBU etc. worksite not in line with required commencing works. 3. T MI 4. Ensure that they hold license's and
Documentation of safety standards competencies that are valid and
superceded standards 4. T C suitable for works undertaking
1. Remove cones from Centre of narrow 1. John 1. Provide accurate information
roads at T C station. Holland relating to Road conditions and
If Work
2. Amendsite conditions
sign placementchange and this
to accommodate Group 1. Monitor work site conditions
Variation of Design environment
Change in position of T CD due to Source / Event
obstacles becomes
and provide lineaofconcern
sight to aT Site
CD 2
2. .Consider
Contact site
details supplied
conditions and road
MUT CD Present at at
this Specific Risk
road layout and environmental Not present this Moderate
Rare Minor Medium
Low 3. Repeat signAssessment
on same side shall be if
of road Unlikely Minor Low 2. T MD 3. Report
layout any changes to
limitations
AGT T M location undertaken and if the situation is unable to conditions to PC or Supervisor
3. Adjust with in tolerances contact
conditions unsuitable to duplicate on other side of road
QGT T M be addressed Contact Supervisors and/or 4 Report
T MD any changes
if adjustments to the
exceed Team
tolerance
4. Remove duplicate signage when unsafe 3. T MI
T MD for further actions leader
4. Evaluate T C station and sign
to implement due to road layout or
environmental reasons 4. T C positioning
1. John
Holland
Length Of Shuttle flow operation If Work site conditions change and this Group 1. Monitor work site conditions
Design outside scope 1. Review
Source by person
/ Event competent
becomes in area
a concern a Site 2
1. .Notification
Contact details supplied allow
of requirements
exceeds guide.
MUT CD Present
Not at at
present this
this outside
Specificthe scope
Risk of MUT CD
Assessment AGT
shall beT M 3.
timeReport any and
for design changes to
consultation
Traffic Light operations greater than 2 Moderate
Rare Minor Medium
Low Unlikely Minor Low 2. T MD
AGT T M location QGT TM
undertaken and if the situation is unable to 2.Direct tasks
conditions to to
PC qualified persons
or Supervisor
way operations beRPEQ
addressed Contact Supervisors and/or 3. Report
4 Setup Tany
GS as per instructions
changes to the Team
QGT T M 2. Design and Sign off
Road safety Barrier Systems T MD for further actions 3. T MI leader
4. T C
TGS TITLE:
John Holland Group - Lake Macdonald Drive, Lake Macdonald - SA_TT - JHG-25LV-24110095-RA - Page 01 Jay Persich TMD 1578 OPEN
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.