Original source · versioned page text
2015-11-16 General Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Page 8 of 20
ATTACHMENT 1
Ecosure Flying Fox Management Options report: Summary of public consultation submissions
Submitter 1 Concern about smell, bat droppings, health risks. Supported except investigate the
Local resident Support an active management plan involving success of deterrent trails elsewhere
sprinkler system deterrent trial, canopy trimming, first.
15m buffer zones, re-establishment of colony on
Goat Island.
Submitter 2 Over 60 complaints from guests, largely | There is currently no known | Attempting to ‘move the bats on’ is not
Ivory Palms Resort concerning smell. Also staining of car paint. | practical method to ‘move the bats | supported and likely to fail.
Potential negative publicity for resort. Submitter | on’.
would like to see them moved on.
Submitter 3 Enjoys observing the flying colony and does not | Flying foxes are protected by | Council observes Federal and State
Noosa resident want to see the flying foxes harmed. Environmental Law and are not to | law and Codes of Practice for Flying
be harmed. Fox Management .
Submitter 4 Does not agree with Ecosure recommendations: ¢ Council is not responsible for | Continue to encourage residents
Local resident e Education: does not believe education will help wildlife, or the impacts of to implement general mitigation
* Covering of vehicles and structures: does not wildlife, on private land. action on their own land.
believe this is practical e There is no evidence that|« Recommend further buffer
* Double glazing of windows: who pays? dispersals’ have ever worked. management.
e Ecosure used historic | ¢ Recommend investigate the use of
. s rts buff t monitoring data in its deterrents, particularly sprinkler
UPPOr's Dulrer Managemen assessment. systems to increase the buffer
e Initiate smoke, water and noise deterrents. + Investigating subsidy funding areas.
e Manage risks of aircraft strike. was a recommendation by|e Continue discussions with Noosa
Ecosure. Currently there is no Hospital.
e Conduct dispersals after other attempts have Federal, State or Local|e Attempts to disperse are not
been made. Government funding for private recommended as per Ecosure
e Did Ecosure consider times of peak flying fox landholders, but there are report.
numbers? funding possibilities for |e Recommend that local businesses
e Provide subsidy funding for outdoor structures business and associations. and associations investigate
etc. e Actions are planned to be grants and funding for mitigation
e Re-establish Goat Island roost site. delivered ASAP subject to actions.
e Actions need to be taken ASAP before flying regulatory and Council |e |t is recommended that measures
foxes return. resourcing availability. to re-establish the Goat Island
Roost site be investigated.
Page 8 of 20See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.