Original source · versioned page text
_241022 - 203 & 207 Gympie Tce - Preliminary Architect's Statement
oskar booth architect
[email protected]
0 4 1 0 4 64 4 4 8
23 hill street pomona qld 4568
abn 14 769 610 998
reg. No. 5601 (qld)
22nd October 2024
Noosa Council
Attn: Andrew Gaffney
Via email: [email protected]
Re: MCU24/0074 - 203 & 207 Gympie Tce Noosaville Qld
Dear Andrew,
Thanks for our recent meeting on this project. We have revised the plans since that meeting and I would like to offer
some architectural commentary on the proposed changes to accompany the submission:
Architect's Statement - Preliminary massing stage
The proposal has undergone a major reworking based on the verbal feedback at our last meeting with Noosa
Council. The setbacks, streetscape treatment and corner elements have seen the greatest changes as well as a
complete redesign of level 2 and level 3 .
Streetscape & Public interface - In general we have looked to maximise the amount of soft landscape within the
first 2m of the site, and stepped most retaining walls so that there is an intermediate planting zone between footpath
level and terrace level (2.7) to minimise visible retaining walls. We also aimed to provide landscape softening (as best
as possible) to the requisite ramps and stairs needed for access. A corner stair has been added to the NW corner in
response to council's concerns over the activation of this corner. Further detail and refinement is needed to the public
space area. Input from Council would be beneficial regarding council's preference for the verge works and any
future street upgrades, so we can integrate this into our design.
Setbacks - Following council's verbal feedback, we have increased setbacks to most of the proposal.
● Gympie Tce: Ground -We have increased the setback to the structural columns to 6m, with the eave /
planter bed cantilevering to the 5m setback line. We consider this appropriate as it provides permanent
shading to the public space below along the column line, and provides visual privacy to the unit balconies
above through the use of planter beds. A retractable awning / operable roof is proposed to extend to the
3m or 2m setback line, and this may be a combination of timber cantilevered structures or post and beam
type structures that bring a nice texture and materiality to the public realm. Some feedback from
Council regarding the extent of landscape structures permitted within the setback zone would be helpful
here, as well as commentary on if a 2m setback to such a structure would be acceptable. Level 01
setback is 6m to the balcony edge with the planter bed cantilevering to the 5m setback line ( part of the
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 2 pages
Page 2
roof for the ground floor below). The setback to level 2 has been increased to 8m, with the planter bed
extending to the 6m setback ( as part of the roof of level 01 below). I consider the planter bed's forward of
the setback are appropriate as they are <1m in height and form part of the roof structure for the level
below. Level 03 ( roof terrace) - Has been reduced in scope to only have two terraces with planter beds to
provide screening. Pergola structures are still included to these areas, as they are well setback from the
boundary and considered to have little impact to the surrounding neighbourhood.
● Thomas St: We have redesigned the corner element as per the below. Other changes include a
reduction in setback to T3 and T4, to respond to the existing street condition in this area, which currently
has a nil setback at ground level and has a neighbouring property that has both nil setback as well as a
street awning over the footpath. The revised setback to T3 and T4 acts forms a transition from the nil
setback of the neighbouring property to the 6m setback of T2. This will provide a more interesting
streetscape ( varied setbacks) and a nicer pedestrian experience when walking along thomas st.
Proposed bi-fold windows and bar style seating along this reduced setback facade will provide for better
activation of the street than a 6m setback and add another layer of visual interest. Level 01 and Level 02
setbacks have been increased to 6m and 8m respectively.
● Albert St: A similar strategy to Gympie terrace has been adopted, with setbacks of 6m on ground floor,
5m to a cantilevered planter bed on level 01 and 8m setback to level 02. The only encroachments to the
setbacks are for planter beds incorporated in the roof of the level below.
● Corner Element & Pool Tce: The corner element has been redesigned to be smaller and with a finer
grain appearance. It has been reduced in height, and the extent of structure forward of the 6m setback
has been reduced with the structural slab and roof beam at 4.5m setback. We propose a series of timber
clad sun shading screens that cantilever over the public space below, creating a dynamic and interesting
corner element that looks different from all angles. A deep slab edge provides visual separation between
the public space below and the terrace above. Planter beds between the sun shading blades allow for
vertical plantings to encapsulate the corner element over time. This has been designed to be an open
style structure akin to an oversized pergola that addresses the corner. The openness and sculptural
quality of this space should be considered when assessing the setback encroachments. We propose that
this space remain unroofed.
Height - To reduce the extent of height encroachments, Level 3 has been redesigned and the roof terraces have
been reduced to only 2, both of which are screened with perimeter planter beds that will hide the pergolas and roof
structures once established. The extent of height encroachment is a very small portion of the site and is located away
from the perimeter of the proposal. The roof elements on this level above the 12m height are limited to above the
external stairs only. The pergola structures are of an open nature and assist in defining this space for their users. We
propose sun shading devices to be used ( ie timber battens, umbrellas, retractable awnings within the pergola
structures. It should also be noted that the roof structures will not be visible by pedestrians from the adjacent streets.
Page 3
Built Form: The overall built form of the proposal follows the design philosophy discussed at our recent meeting; The built form is broken up into a series of smaller elements separated by generous open air breezeways, reducing the bulk and scale of the proposal. The breezeway ensures the proposal has great cross ventilation and access to natural light and responds to the Noosa way of life. The public realm (ground level) is a generous landscaped terrace, with the building line on the ground floor protected by deep eaves, awnings and areas for outdoor dining. Opportunities for shaded outdoor space is provided by retractable awnings within the setback zone to encourage the space to be well used and not just a thoroughfare. The corner element is a highly detailed architectural element that is dynamic in nature and provides visual interest to the corner ( as described above) The materiality of the proposal has not been explored in much detail (yet) and will be further resolved as we progress. At this stage the design is more of a massing and area study. I hope this assists in understanding the proposal and the changes since we last met. Kind regards Oskar Booth, Director and Founder Arkos Architects / Oskar Booth Architect 0410464448 [email protected] For and on behalf of Oskar Booth Architect / Arkos Architects Pty Ltd