Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Original source · versioned page text

ECM_22150383_v5_Pre-Lodgement Notes PLM22 0055

of 4

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                 5.      ADVICE & INFORMATION

                 Lisa Pienaar - Comments
                 Questions posed by applicant:
                 1.      Design feedback to ensure a well made application-
                         Comments:
                         a. The height of the wall associated with the BBQ and outdoor living area and
                            associated roofline on the boundary are an issue in terms of amenity on adjoining
                            property. These structures are to comply with the setback requirements in Noosa
                            Plan. The garage on the boundary must also comply with QDC requirements, if it is
                            to be on the boundary.
                         b. The pool and trellis structure also do not meet the setback requirements and this
                            compromises the amenity on adjoining land. Due to the height of these structures,
                            they are to comply with the setback requirements in Noosa Plan.
                         c. Further, there is a concern with the height of the pool. This presents significant
                            overlooking opportunities to the adjoining property. The height of the pool is also a
                            concern as it will be seaward to the coastal building line and will be clearly seen from
                            the beach, especially when lit. There is not support for a pool seaward of the coastal
                            building line and at the proposed height and setback to the side boundary. Please
                            note that the pool that is more than 1 metre above ground is considered site cover.
                         d. Additional to discussions: Currently part of the dwelling is within the 6 metre setback
                            to Seaview Tce. There is a concern that the redevelopment will include another
                            structure in the front setback which is the front entry/ramp which is roofed to a large
                            extent. There is a reluctance to accept this as it will be quite dominant to the street
                            and it is unlikely to be supported.
                         e. With the application, include with the plan set, the coastal building line and ensure
                            the site and floor plans shows all boundaries of the lot.
                 2.      Confirmation of key planning parameters / level of assessment.
                         Comment:
                         Code assessable – application is a Development Approval for Building Works
                         assessable against the Noosa Plan. Applicable codes:
                          Low Density Housing code
                              Low Density Residential zone code
                              Coastal Protectional and Scenic Amenity Overlay code
                              Landslide hazard Overlay code
                 3.      Site constraints in relation to setbacks (seaward).
                         Comment:
                          a. Council’s coastal hazards mapping identifies the site as being within an erosion
                             prone area. Part of the site is within the 2020, while most of the site is within the
                             2040 and all of the site is located in the 2070 area.
                          b. Provide a Geotechnical Report and Coastal Hazard Assessment from a registered
                             engineer who is an expert in coastal erosion processes.
                          c. Provide a stormwater management report that aligns with the geotechnical report.


                  This document is a record of prelodgement discussions and will not be made available for public viewing. Prelodgement
                  discussions are conducted to explore development options and requirements, identify issues and provide guidance to prospective
                  applicants about Council’s policies for development. The recorded discussion items and outcomes in no way imply or commit to
                  an approval of the proposal on the part of Council or Council officers, nor guarantee that all potential issues associated with a
                  development proposal have been raised / identified. When a formal development application is lodged, the proposal will be
                  assessed on its planning merits in accordance with Council’s policy framework existing at the time of the assessment.
Document Set ID: 22150383
Version: 5, Version Date: 31/10/2022
Log in to download the original file

ECM_22150383_v5_Pre-Lodgement Notes PLM22 0055.pdf · 138 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.