Original source · versioned page text
Reference Document - MCU24 0155 (As Published)
DCM BUILDING DESIGN 18 SHEARWATER STREET, PEREGIAN BEACH – STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 5 CONCL USIO NS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the findings of the Rational method analysis for the site there is a slight decrease in runoff of less than 1 L/s between pre and post development as shown in Table 5 below therefore, there is no significant change in pre and post development flows from the site. Table 5: Pre-development vs Post-development Comparison ARI Pre-development Post-development Comparison Discharge (Q, L/s) Discharge (Q, L/s) (L/s) 1 10.88 10.84 -0.04 2 12.91 12.86 -0.05 5 19.35 19.28 -0.07 10 23.90 23.81 -0.09 20 28.70 28.60 -0.10 50 36.84 36.71 -0.13 100 42.75 42.59 -0.16 To address item 15 from Noosa councils Request for Information, there is no need for collection or detention of stormwater runoff for the proposed site for the purposes of mitigating post development flow to predevelopment levels however, as discussed in chapter 4 of this report, sufficient collection of stormwater runoff is required to meet councils’ specific performance outcomes. Although the site falls under Level 0 roof water design standards per QUDM Section 7.13.10, it is recommended to discharge roof runoff via a minimum 150mm diameter uPVC pipe to the existing open drain located in the rear (eastern) buffer. The outlet should include a small plastic headwall (or similar) and at least 0.3m² of 100mm D50 rock to prevent scour and ensure free drainage. This solution is feasible only if existing drain levels are sufficient to allow connection and would meet the Level 1 drainage design criteria outlined in QUDM Section 7.13.11. Page 14 of 17
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewLog in to download the original (Reference Document - MCU24 0155 (As Published).pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.