Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Original source · versioned page text

2019-04-09 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda

of 90

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA                                   9 APRIL 2019


O20 Buildings and other structures including swimming pools and retaining walls do not extend
seaward of the coastal building line except—
a)   uncovered and unenclosed cantilevered balconies that do not extend greater than 3m
     seaward of the coastal building line; and
b)   are setback a minimum of 6m from the seaward boundary (refer below).




The proposal does not comply with Specific Outcome O18 as it is considered the development
seaward of the Coastal Building Line has the potential to interrupt the natural cycles of erosion
and accretion of the beach. Furthermore, the proposal does not comply with Specific Outcome 20
as the new development does not comply with the 15m setback of the coastal building line and
the cantilevered walkway/deck is only setback 3 metres from the seaward boundary.
Given the proposal does not comply with the Specific Outcomes, the following Overall Outcomes
for the Natural Resources Overlay Code are applicable:
13.42.2 The overall outcomes sought for the Natural Resources Overlay Code are—
f)   for Coastal Protection Areas, development —
     i     does not adversely impact upon natural coastal processes; and
     ii    is designed and sited to protect the natural beach experience and visual amenity
           enjoyed by residents and others.
It is pertinent that new climate change information and modelling has highlighted that within the
life of this development serious erosion may occur and risk life and property.
Erosion prone areas should be retained in their natural state where they can act as a buffer
between land uses and the beach to allow the natural coastal processes to occur, without the
need for intervention to protect human life and property. It is considered the proposal will
adversely impact on the coastal processes as a 6m landscaped setback is not sufficient to
minimise the risk of erosion.
Consistent with the Noosa Plan, no new buildings, structures, swimming pools and retaining
walls can occur seaward of the coastal building line, except for uncovered and unenclosed
cantilevered balconies that do not extend greater than 3 metres seaward of the Coastal Building
Line and are setback a minimum of 6 metres from the seaward boundary. The proposed
deck/walkway is 3 metres setback from the seaward boundary, with a large portion of the
dwelling seaward of the Coastal Building Line.




                                                                                  Page 14 of 90
Log in to download the original file

2019-04-09 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda(PDF, 6MB).pdf · 6.0 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.