Council archive · source document
Module 10 · OPW16/0098
Attached to the e-mail OPW16/0098 - Operational Works Application.
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
AO5.2 Development in a storm tide inundation area is 1. No reduction in dune crest heights.
located, designed, constructed and operated to: 2. Site is presently characterised by sandy beaches. No
(1) maintain dune crest heights, or where a reduction in ecosystems are present which provide a buffer from storm
crest heights cannot be avoided, mitigate risks to tide inundation (i.e. no mangroves or wetlands are present).
development from wave overtopping and storm tide
inundation
(2) maintain or enhance coastal ecosystems and natural
features, such as mangroves and coastal wetlands,
between the development and tidal waters, where the
coastal ecosystems and natural features protect or
buffer communities and infrastructure from storm tide
inundation.
AND
AO5.3 Redevelopment of built structures in the erosion N/A
prone area within a coastal management district:
(1) avoids intensifying the use of the premises, or
(2) demonstrates that any intensification of use will not
result in an increase in the need for erosion control
structures or riverbank hardening.
AND
AO5.4 Development that is coastal protection work Historically, Council has undertaken ongoing maintenance
involves: nourishment at this site. The maintenance nourishment was
(1) beach nourishment undertaken in accordance with a required to be undertaken regularly and provided only short-
program of beach nourishment works that source term protection. As such, it is considered that an erosion
sediment of a suitable quality and type from outside control structure is the only feasible option to address
the active beach system, or erosion at this site.
(2) the construction of an erosion control structure,
where it is demonstrated that installing an erosion
control structure is the only feasible option for
protecting permanent structures from coastal erosion
and those structures cannot be abandoned or
relocated in the event of coastal erosion occurring.
Editor’s note: Applications for coastal protection work should be
supported by a report certified by a Registered Professional
Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) that demonstrates how the
engineering solution sought by the work will be achieved.
Editor’s note: Applications for erosion control structures should
demonstrate the consideration of beach nourishment techniques,
and include a statement of why nourishment (in whole or part)
State development assessment provisions Module 10 — Coastal protection 10.1 Tidal works, or development in a coastal management district state code
10 October 2014 V1.5 Page 4 of 16
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Module 10.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 198 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.