Council archive · source document
Module 10 · OPW16/0098
Attached to the e-mail OPW16/0098 - Operational Works Application.
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
PO4 Development avoids the release of AO4.1 Development that involves the manufacture or N/A
hazardous materials as a result of a storage of hazardous materials in bulk are designed to:
natural hazard event. (1) prevent the intrusion of waters from a defined storm
Editor’s note: Applications should: tide event into structures or facilities containing the
hazardous materials, or
(1) assess the risk of storm tide inundation
(2) ensure hazardous materials remain secured despite
releasing or otherwise exposing
hazardous materials, including inundation, including secure from the effects of
appropriate emergency planning and hydrodynamic forcing associated with wave action or
contingency measures. flowing water.
(2) applications are to be supported by a
report certified by a Registered
Professional Engineer of Queensland
(RPEQ) that demonstrates this
performance outcome will be achieved.
PO5 Natural processes and the AO5.1 Development in an erosion prone area within the 1. No removal or damage to vegetation.
protective function of landforms and coastal management district: 2. No decrease to foreshore sediment volumes. Associated
vegetation are maintained in coastal (1) maintains vegetation on coastal landforms where its nourishment (if undertaken) would increase sediment
hazard areas. removal or damage may: volumes.
(a) destablise the area and increase the potential
3. Erosion control structures have proven necessary in this
for erosion, or
location as historic nourishment works have proven short-
(b) interrupt natural sediment trapping processes or lived and high-maintenance.
dune or land building processes
4. Given the low-crested nature of the proposed works, the
(2) maintains sediment volumes of dunes and near-shore
coastal landforms, or where a reduction in sediment potential trapping of longshore transport by the groyne is
volumes cannot be avoided, increased risks to reduced. As separate approvals are in place to allow
development from coastal erosion are mitigated by nourishment to be placed between the groynes, groynes can
location, design, construction and operating also be artificially “filled” to further reduce short-term impacts
standards associated with initial natural trapping and re-alignment. In
the event of significant observed negative impacts not offset
(3) minimises the need for erosion control structures or
by nourishment, the trial structure can easily be removed.
riverbank hardening through location, design and
construction standards 5. The development is an erosion control structure.
(4) maintains physical coastal processes outside the 6. Adjacent areas of foreshore upstream have been
development footprint for the development, including hardened using rock and are not prone to erosion. Adjacent
longshore transport of sediment along the coast areas of foreshore downstream are protected by a
(5) reduces the risk of shoreline erosion for areas temporary sand-filled geotextile container seawall.
adjacent to the development footprint unless the
development is an erosion control structure
(6) reduces the risk of shoreline erosion for areas
adjacent to the development footprint to the
maximum extent feasible in the case of erosion
control structures.
AND
State development assessment provisions Module 10 — Coastal protection 10.1 Tidal works, or development in a coastal management district state code
10 October 2014 V1.5 Page 3 of 16
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Module 10.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 198 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.