Original source · versioned page text
2014-09-25 Ordinary Meeting Minutes
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 25 SEPTEMBER 2014
36. Proposed tree plantings must maintain a minimum horizontal clearance of 1.0
metre from Unitywater water mains and 1.5 metres from Unitywater sewerage
mains. Landscaping plants within these clearances must be low growing when
mature and suitable approved varieties.
37. During the maintenance period the applicant must carry out necessary repairs
to: defects and/or damage of road works; drainage and associated work; water
supply and sewerage reticulation and associated equipment. These repairs
include damage and/or alterations caused by third parties carrying out works
within the development.
38. Construction works undertaken in the vicinity of Unitywater’s existing water
supply or sewerage infrastructure must not adversely affect the integrity of the
infrastructure. All costs associated with repair, replacement or alteration to
existing infrastructure must be met by the applicant.
Prior to issue of certificate of compliance
39. As Constructed drawings shall be lodged in both hardcopy and ADAC digital
format in GDA94 Zone 56 coordinate values. As constructed drawings will be
required prior to works being accepted On Maintenance. The GDA co-
ordinates and AHD levels of all permanent survey marks installed shall be
provided. The surveyed location, meter numbers and readings of water meters
installed by the developer must be included in the as - constructed information.
40. A water meter record sheet must be completed and submitted to Unitywater
prior to works being accepted on-maintenance.
41. Upon completion of the works a certificate must be issued by a RPEQ certifying
that the works have been constructed in accordance with Unitywater standards,
and in compliance with the approved plans and specifications. The works must
be supervised by the Engineer in a planned and timely manner to ensure the
integrity of the certification is upheld.
B. Find the following are sufficient grounds to justify the decision despite the conflict with
the Planning Scheme:
1. The proposal provides for a high level of residential amenity, consistent with the
surrounding development in the area and The Noosa Plan requirements for the
Semi Attached Housing zone;
2. The development is located within convenient access to the major road network
and surrounding shops; and
3. The proposed built form is equivalent to 2 duplex developments, which is
consistent with the permitted development on the site.
4 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR RECONFIGURING A LOT - 1 LOT INTO 2 LOTS
AND AN ACCESS EASEMENT AT 22 & 23 EDWARD STREET, COORAN REC14/0002
Item not dealt with by Planning & Organisation Committee. Referred to General
N
Committee for consideration.
Reason for referral: Cr Playford disagrees with the Recommendation.
Page 17 of 27
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.