06/2361 - MCU Multiple Housing Type 2 Duplex [As Published] · 132006.2361

column 1 column 2 fotos ims)
Specific Outcomes Probable solutions (if code assessable) Compliance
Noosa Drive alignments— 2 d) for any other zone— 8m;
storeys; or c) The area of the intrusion is relatively minor
e balance area of site — 4 storeys; and is located at the rear of the site which
or adjoins an area of public open space. The
iii For Attached Housing Zone — 3 development presents a singe storey to the
storeys with the exception of Lot 4 on street. Due to the sloping roof form and the
SP 100064 in Serenity Close, where a open design of the rear of the building the
maximum height of 4 storeys is building will not impose on the rear open space
permitted; or area.
iv For any other zone— 2 storeys;
c) donot visually dominate the street or d) The proposed encroachment will not be
surrounding spaces; visible from the surrounding areas due to the
d) preserve the amenity of surrounding land; slope of the site and the design of the building.
e) respect the scale of surrounding vegetation,
f) respond to the topography of the site by e) The height of the building will be of a similar
minimising cut and fill (eg. stepping down the level to the surrounding vegetation.
site or using a suspended pole construction);
and f) The design of the building minimises the need
g) maintain a mature vegetated skyline. to cut and fill on the site through the suspended

slab construction.

g) Due to the location of the existing vegetation
in the middle of the site, there is limited
opportunity to retain these trees. The applicant
is willing to landscape the setback areas to
further screen the development.

 

 

___|
| Setbacks
08 Buildings and other structures are $8.1 Buildings and structures comply with the The proposal generally complies with the required
appropriately designed and sited to— minimum setbacks identified in Schedule 1 - setbacks except in relation to the rear setback.
a) provide amenity for users of the premises as {| Minimum Boundary Setbacks.
well as preserve the visual and acoustic The applicant proposes a setback of 4.6 metres
amenity of adjoining and nearby properties; to the facade of the building whereas the
b) preserve any existing vegetation that will probable solutions indicate a setback of 6.0
buffer the proposed building; metres.
c) allow for landscaping to be provided between
buildings; The reduced setback is considered to fulfil the
d) maintain the visual continuity and pattern of Specific Outcomes in the following manner:
buildings and landscape elements within the
street; a) the rear boundary adjoins public parkland and

 

 

 

e) protect public safety and property within the development will not impact on the function of