Original source · versioned page text
Appendix J - Civil Engineering Report and SBSMP
Noosa Residential Development
Ref: 24553 C R002 REV03 10.08.21.docx
August 2021
‘B1,B2&b3_Unmitigated’; and
Three (3) Post-Development Mitigated Catchments B1, B2 & B3; ‘B1’, ‘B2’ and ‘B3’.
A modelled representation of the bioretention basins were provided to capture storage that occurs
over the bioretention extended detention zone;
The bioretention basins were provided with separate outlets simulated using multi-links;
Each node included runoff sub-catchments simulating the contributing areas;
The sub-catchment areas were split into 0% impervious & 100% impervious areas;
The models were run through all storms from 10min to 24-hour durations for all AR&R 2016
generated storms to determine the critical storm events for each duration and AEP; and
The model was run assuming both a free-outlet and a tailwater level at the outlet node to match
the top of the downstream open-channel within the drainage covenant.
6.3.1 Pre-Development Case Model
The pre-development scenario model consisted of nodes representing the pre-developed
contributing catchments as described above. A link with negligible energy loss was added to the
downstream end of the runoff node and connected to an outfall node as to provide a single point of
comparison between the pre- and post-development cases.
6.3.2 Post-Development Case Model
The Hydraulic mode of XP-Storm is used to assess the stormwater runoff calculated in the Runoff
mode by introducing factors such as storage and outlet configurations. The developed model
includes the nodes for the post-developed catchments shown in Table 2.
Piped flows from catchments B1 and B2 are to be directed to flow diversion chambers, where low-
flow outlet pipes will limit flows to the bioretention to an approximation of the 4EY event (Q3month
event) to limit scouring of the bioretention. The balance of flows are to bypass the bioretention basins
and flow directly to the LPD.
A general link with negligible energy loss was added downstream of the post-developed model and
connected to an outfall node to provide a single point of comparison between the pre and post-
development cases.
XP-STORM modelling indicated that 14.0m3 within the OSD tank is adequate to mitigate the
discharged flows for peak events up to and including the 1% AEP event and ensure there is no
increase in discharge for any and all storms for events up to and including the 24-hour, 1% AEP
event to pre-development rates. This was tested assuming a limited flows in the open-channel at the
LPD (free outlet) and assuming that the open-channel is running full (Fixed Backwater to 4.25m
AHD).
The proposed OSD outlet configurations are presented in Table 3.
Table 3 – Detention Outlet Configuration
Catchment / OSD Low flow orifice Weir
10m long weir 0.60m above OSD invert
100mm above bioretention surface to
B1 Nil
simulate combined length of top of 900x900
pit in bio and overflow to swale
3.6m long weir 0.25m above Bio retained
100x500 low flow orifice
water level to simulate length of top of
B2 at Bio retained water level
900x900 pit in bio
BRISBANE / SYDNEY / MELBOURNE / GOLD COAST / SUNSHINE COAST / DARWIN / PERTH Page 13
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewLog in to download the original (Appendix J - Civil Engineering Report and SBSMP.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.