Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

ASTP-Resp-To-FA

of 5

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

RESPONSE
Please refer to the Civil Engineering Plans provided in Attachment 1, which provides a sewer reticulation plan
and illustrates adequate fall between the sewer main and Units 2 and 3.



            ITEM 8 - EARTHWORKS
            The submitted documentation includes significant amounts of earthworks across the site.
            An Earthworks Plan has not been provided.

            Information Required
            Provide an Earthworks Plan demonstrating the extent of the proposed earthworks required
            to carry out the proposed works. The additional plan must be prepared by a suitably qualified
            person (RPEQ – Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland) and include, but not be
            limited to:
            a. the extent and volume of cut and fill;
            b. provide comment on whether the excess earth will be transported off-site or temporarily
                 stored on-site (if any).

RESPONSE
Please refer to the Civil Engineering Plans provided in Attachment 1, which provide the required earthwork
detail.



            ITEM 9 - PROPOSAL PLANS
            The proposal plans submitted do not clearly detail the proposed setbacks for the
            development.

            Advice Required
            Provide amended plans that detail the site boundaries for the floor plans of all of the units.
            Specifically the sheets 1.100, 1.101, 2.100, 2.101 are to include site boundaries.

RESPONSE
Please refer to the revised Building Design Plans in Attachment 2, which provide side setback notations on all
site and floor plans. As shown, a side setback of at least 2 metres is provided onsite.



            ITEM 10 - GARAGES
            AO15.2 of the Medium Density Residential Zone Code requires multiple garages where they
            face the street to be separated by a minimum of 2 metres or be staggered. The proposed
            garages to Olivine Lane do not meet this requirements and greater variation in the design
            and materials is required.

            Advice Required
            Provide amended plans that provide greater variation to the garage doors facing Olivine
            Lane. Suggestions include the use of two different garage doors and a change of materials
            to the central panel between the garages.




Our ref: 220219                                                                                              Page 4 of 5
Log in to download the original file

ASTP-Resp-To-FA.pdf · 293 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.