Skip to the record
Accept no substitutions.

Original source · versioned page text

Information Request MCU24 0085

of 6

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                 Issue – Vehicle Manoeuvring
                 Insufficient Vehicle Turn Paths have been provided demonstrating that the carparks
                 highlighted below are functional for a B99 vehicle.




                 Figure 4 – Potential collision and carparks requiring Vehicle Turn Paths extracted from Barlow Shelley’s
                                                        Vehicle Turn Paths (C300, Rev. A)

                 It is unclear if the garage “gate” is intended to function as a traditional gate and open inwards.
                 If it is the intention for the garage “gate” to open inwards, then the B99 Vehicle Turn Path
                 shown in Figure 4 collides with the open gate.
                 Information Required
                 7.     Provide additional Vehicle Turn Paths demonstrating a B99 vehicle can manoeuvre in
                        and out of the carparks highlighted in blue in Figure 3. The additional Vehicle Turn Paths
                        must be prepared by a suitably qualified person and include, but not be limited to:
                        a.      a ‘finished position’ that complies with Figure 5.2 of AS2890.01; and
                        b.      avoid any elements of the template colliding with elements of the development
                                (i.e., wheel path, body overhang, etc.).
                 8.     Clarify if the proposed garage “gate” is to function as a traditional gate and open inwards.
                        If this is the intention, then provide amended Vehicle Turn Paths avoiding the collision
                        highlighted in yellow in Figure 4.


                 Issue – Footpath Width
                 Barlow Shelley’s Roadworks and Stormwater Drainage Layout Plan (C201, Rev. A) details a
                 new 1.16m wide footpath. The Noosa Plan 2020 – Planning Scheme Policy 6 Engineering
                 Design Standards calls for footpaths to be a minimum width of 1.5m (Table SC6.7.2).
                 Information Required
                 9.     Provide amended plans including the provision of a 1.5m wide footpath. The amended
                        plans must be prepared by a suitably qualified person (RPEQ).
                        The footpath may be reduced in width to a minimum of 1.2m where necessary due to
                        existing constraints (i.e., existing services, grades, etc.). Any reduction must be
                        adequately justified.




                                                                                                                 Page 5 of 6
Document Set ID: 23131767
Version: 4, Version Date: 30/07/2024
Log in to download the original file

Information Request MCU24 0085.pdf · 826 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.