Original source · versioned page text
MCU10/2083 Development Application part 2 - Attachment 1 - Town Planning Report & Code Assessment_FINAL_291010
Specific Outcomes Probable solutions Proposal
spaces are designed to allow vehicles to No garages or carports are proposed as
enter and exit the site in a forward gear part of this application.
through a 3-point turn maximum;
AND
S50.4 The development provides for Complies
shared driveways to minimise the One access is provided to each street
number of access points, except on sites frontage.
with more than one street frontage,
where garages or carports in the
development front separate streets.
Front fences & walls
O51 Front fences and walls are S51.1 Front fences or walls are setback Not applicable
designed and sited to— an average of 1 metre and are No fences are proposed along the
a) contribute to the attractiveness of the articulated to provide visual interest by Gibson Road or Skipper Place frontages.
street; stepping the design at maximum 5m
b) be compatible with the existing intervals.
streetscape character; AND
c) relate to the architectural period of
the building; S51.2 The area of land between the Complies
d) avoid interference with the fence and the front property boundary All boundaries are proposed to include
movement of surface stormwater; shall be densely landscaped to screen landscaped areas with a minimum width
e) allow for casual surveillance from the any fencing from the street. of 1m.
street or on main roads, mitigate traffic AND
noise; S51.3 Any fencing on the boundary Complies
f) provide for planting in front of high which is not screened by vegetation is All boundary fences are screened by
solid fences and walls; and either less than 1.2m high or of an open vegetation.
g) ensure planting between the front construction.
fence and the footpath does not create
an impediment for pedestrians using the
footpath.
Comment: The proposed development is able to comply with all the Probable Solutions for the
Attached Housing Zone with the exception of the Probable Solution for maximum wall length whereby
an Alternative Solution has been provided to satisfy the corresponding Specific Outcome. While the
proposed use is an inconsistent use and does not comply with specific outcome O44 the proposal
complies with the Desired Environmental Outcomes for Commercial and Business Uses and the overall
outcomes for the Noosaville Locality. Sufficient grounds to justify the proposed use despite this
conflict are detailed in section 6.2 of the Town Planning Report.
BUSINESS USES CODE
Table 14.8 For all Business Uses
Specific Outcomes Probable solutions Proposal
14.15 Effects of Use
Electricity infrastructure
O18 The development does not S18.1 No solution provided Complies
adversely impact on existing or future The subject site is currently connected
electricity supply infrastructure; to electricity. It is not anticipated that
AND the development will adversely impact
electricity supply infrastructure.
O19 All uses and works maintain an S19.1 Development for uses adjacent to Not applicable
adequate safe distance from electrical or within 50m of an existing electricity Site is not adjacent to or within 50m of
infrastructure including substations, substation incorporates noise an electricity substation.
overhead powerlines, power poles and attenuation measures to mitigate noise
transformers. impacts;
AND Complies
S19.2 Buildings and structures Buildings and structures will not be
(including swimming pools, sheds, constructed under any overhead lines or
tennis courts and outbuildings) are not electricity easements.
constructed under overhead electricity
transmission lines, or within electricity
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.