Original source · versioned page text
2021-03-18 Ordinary Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA 18 MARCH 2021
7. The proposed development fails to meet Overall Outcomes 13.7.2 a), b), c), d) (i),
(ii), (iii) and (v), e) and g) and Specific Outcomes O1, O3, O4, O5, O6, O8, O9,
O10, O14, O15, O18 and O19 of the Biodiversity Overlay Code as the proposal
will result in the removal of significant vegetation and intrude into the site’s riparian
buffer.
8. The proposal does not comply with Overall Outcomes 14.157.2 a) an b) of the
Water Sensitive Design Code as the development:
i. is not designed and could not be constructed in a manner that does not
impede, long term attainment of relevant Environmental Values and Water
Quality Objectives as specified in the Environmental Protection Policy 2009;
ii. proposes infrastructure within the riparian zone and an extent of cut and fill
that is likely to create adverse impacts on downstream ecosystems,
properties and infrastructure due to changes to stormwater flow, water quality
or ecosystem health.
9. The application proposes development within the Water Supply Catchment which
may result in adverse effects on the quality of water entering Lake Macdonald
contrary to Specific Outcome O11 of the Natural Hazards and Natural Resources
Overlay Code.
10. The proposal does not comply with Overall Outcome 14.111.2 (c) and Specific
Outcome O7 of the Driveways and Car Parking Code as:
i. Sufficient visitor parking is not provided and appropriately located for visitors
of the Retirement and Special Needs use; and
ii. Sufficient parking is not provided for the golf club house.
11. The proposal does not comply with Overall Outcome 14.111.2 (c) and Specific
Outcome O8 of the Driveways and Car Parking Code and Specific Outcome O7
and O36 of the Residential Uses Code as internal driveways are too narrow to
satisfactorily accommodate internal traffic movements.
12. The proposed built form and landscaping is not consistent with the preferred
character within Cooroy and will result in an appearance of excessive bulk, limited
landscaping and continual roof form.
13. Noosa Plan 2020 has identified that it can meet the requirements for residential
accommodation until 2041 within the current Urban Growth Boundary. The
application has failed to demonstrate a significant planning need to develop outside
of these boundaries, nor any overriding community benefit which would justify
approving the development despite its conflict with the Planning Scheme and
relevant State Planning Policies.
14. In preparing the Noosa Plan 2020 and in reviewing submissions pertaining to this
property Council considered the development potential and suitability of this site
and it was considered that despite its inclusion within the Urban Footprint of the
SEQ Regional Plan, commitment of the land for urban purposes was neither
necessary nor appropriate.
15. The proposal is not consistent with the provisions of the Noosa Plan 2020 which
seek that the land is developed for rural residential purposes.
16. The proposal does not comply with the overall outcomes sought by the Biodiversity,
Waterways and Wetlands overlay code in Noosa Plan 2020 as the development:
i. is not designed, sited, nor could it be constructed in a way that avoids
adverse impacts on ecologically important areas, ecological systems and
processes.
ii. does not propose to conserve, manage, enhance and nor rehabilitate to
Page 22 of 29
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.