Original source · versioned page text
EMP v2 - ESSENCE OF PEREGIAN 215 DAVID LOW WAY, PEREGIAN BEACH
Essence of Peregian Beach Project v2
Environmental Management Plan (Construction and Operation)
Groundwater Are there any parts of the property which indicate the Yes. Some ground seepage observed in low-lying areas Works undertaken in accordance with Stormwater
presence of sub-surface water reservoirs or ground towards western boundary of site Management Plan.
seepage?
❑ Natural springs.
❑ Known seepage areas.
❑ Local bore water.
❑ Other (i.e. local knowledge).
SOILS AND GEOLOGY
Soil Erosion Environmental Does the site have any soil erosion risk factors? Possible. Site is positioned on a gentle slope running down The release of sediments or other contaminants to waters is
and sediment Protection Act 1994 ▪ Erosive/dispersive soils to the Reserve/ National Park and therefore presents a an offence under Section 440ZG of the Environmental
control ▪ hill slope stability problems (steep possible soil erosion risk during clearing and construction Protection Act 1994. To minimise the risk of releasing
Environmental topography) activities. It is not expected that the site has major slope sediment (and other contaminants) to waters during
Protection (Water) ▪ High intensity rainfall events stability issues. Soil erosion risk assessment would be construction and to meet the General Environmental Duty
Policy 1998 required to determine risk status. under the EP Act, a Site Erosion and Sediment Control Plan
(ESCP) must be prepared/certified by a suitably qualified
SPP: State interest— person prior to commencing construction. The ESCP must be
water quality implemented and monitored throughout the construction
phase.
Will construction require specific soil control and/or Possible. Soil erosion risk assessment would be required To minimise the risk of releasing sediment (and other
rehabilitation treatments to minimise impacts on existing to determine risk status. contaminants) to waters during construction and to meet the
environment (other than normal construction General Environmental Duty under the EP Act, a Site Erosion
management controls)? and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) must be
(i.e. sediment basins, surface protection, wetlands etc.) prepared/certified by a suitably qualified person prior to
commencing construction. The ESCP must be implemented
and monitored throughout the construction phase.
ASS SPP: State interest— Does the site have acid sulfate soils or potential acid Presence of ASS / PASS possible. Manage site as per requirements of approved Acid Sulfate
water quality sulphate soils? Soil and Groundwater Management Plan.
Are acid sulfate soils likely to be disturbed by proposed Possibly NA
development works?
Is it likely that State Planning Policy: State interest - Yes NA
water quality will be triggered by the proposed
development?
Soil Soil Conservation Act Is the site subject to salinity or soil degradation? No NA
conservation 1986 Is any part of the site subject to an approved project
plan for soil conservation?
Local Planning Does the site include land identified as good quality No. NA
Scheme agricultural land, or is the site adjacent to agricultural
areas?
If so, will the proposal be compatible with agricultural
activities?
Other Local Planning Is there evidence, knowledge or likely indications that No NA
geotechnical Schemes rock or other geological features may be present or
features encountered on site?
❑ Rocky terrain.
❑ Shallow topsoil with under bearing rock substrata.
❑ Mines.
❑ Faults, slips, subsidence or other movement.
❑ Local knowledge.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original