Original source · versioned page text
Appendix B - SWMP, Flood Cert & Form 15
3. STORMWATER QUANTITY
3. 1. P R E – P O S T C O M P A R I S O N
The site has been modelled using the Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis module in its
existing and unmitigated proposed developed state. The catchment hydrology has been
configured in accordance with the Bureau of Meteorology’s IFD curves for the locality, and
a minimum time of concentration of 5 minutes for each catchment. All catchments for the
proposed development and the internal drainage network and storage areas have been
modelled as described in Figure 2.2 – Existing Catchments Plan and Figure 2.3 – Proposed
Catchments Plan. The results of the modelling against the range of design storms for the
development under the existing and proposed development conditions are shown in
Table 3.1 Existing and proposed unmitigated site peak discharge rates
53 Doonella Street 55 Doonella Street
Total
A.E.P Qexisting Qproposed Qchange Qexisting Qproposed Qchange Qchange
(m³/s) (m³/s) (m³/s) (m³/s) (m³/s) (m³/s) (m³/s)
63.20% 0.009 0.014 0.005 0.012 0.015 0.003 0.008
50% 0.010 0.016 0.006 0.013 0.017 0.004 0.010
20% 0.014 0.021 0.007 0.019 0.023 0.004 0.011
10% 0.017 0.025 0.008 0.022 0.028 0.006 0.014
5% 0.020 0.029 0.009 0.026 0.032 0.006 0.015
2% 0.024 0.033 0.009 0.030 0.037 0.007 0.016
1% 0.026 0.037 0.011 0.034 0.040 0.006 0.017
As the site has increased the total peak flows from the site, attenuation storage will be
required to mitigate the outflows to ensure that the development does not exceed the
predevelopment levels.
To determine the attenuation required, the model for the developed site was updated to
include the proposed stormwater attenuation devices to be provided for the development.
Rainwater attenuation tanks were modelled as storage nodes with 2 3kL tanks provided per
development. An attenuation portion equal to half the capacity of the tank was modelled,
with a low flow outlet of 25mm and high flow outlet of 100mm. The reuse portion of the tank
was assumed to be full at the time of the storm so only the attenuation portion contributes
to flow mitigation.
Each bioretention area was modelled as a storage node consisting of the bioretention filter
media and the extended detention depth. A porosity of 0.3 was considered as the water
holding capacity for the filter media, with the low flow pipe consisting of the slotted
drainage pipe and the high flow weir overflow for flows overtopping the pit.
Using this mitigated development model, the proposed developed flows were again
compared to the existing state as shown below in
Page 7 of 22
P +61 7 5211 1003 A 37 Mary St, Noosaville Qld 4566 E [email protected] recorconsulting.com
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.