Original source · versioned page text
Revised Stormwater Management Plan
Attached to the e-mail Response to Council information request - MCU16/0066 & OPW16/0133 - email 2 of 3.
Attached to the e-mail Response to SEQ Water Third Party Advice - MCU16/0066 & OPW16/0133.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Client: Hass Holdings ATF The Quasar Trust Location: Taylor Court, Cooroy
6.3.6 Manning’s Values
Manning’s values varied due to the differing catchment characteristics / land uses and were
applied independently to the catchment. The values were generally adopted as follows:
Pervious Area, n = 0.032; and
Impervious Area, n = 0.018.
6.3.7 Catchment Slope
The Equal Area method was used to determine the catchment slope, which is summarised in
Table 8. The catchment slope in the developed case is unchanged from the existing case scenario.
6.3.8 Storm Durations
Standard storm durations of 15, 20, 25, 30, 45 60 and 90 minutes were modelled to estimate the
peak discharge.
6.4 Calibration
6.4.1 Rational Method
Rational Method calculations were undertaken for the site for calibration of the existing case XP-
RAFTS model – Table 10.
Variable Value Units
Area: 0.924 ha
Tc 5.9 minutes
C10 0.68 fraction
Table 10 - Rational Method Calculations
Variable 1% AEP 10% AEP 39% AEP
Freq Factor 1.2 1.0 0.85
Intensity (mm/hr) 299.5 205.2 149.1
Discharge (m3/s) 0.628 0.358 0.221
The Rational Method Calculations for the 1%, 10% and 39% AEP events generally reflect results
from the XP-RAFTS model. Thus, the XP-RAFTS peak flows have been adopted for hydrological
modelling and detention sizing purposes. A comparison of the results is provided in Table 11.
Table 11 - XP-RAFTS and Rational Method Comparison
Rational XP-RAFTS Difference
AEP (m3/s) (m3/s) (%)
1% 0.628 0.630 0.4
10% 0.358 0.357 -0.4
39% 0.221 0.219 -1.1
6.5 Design Discharges Unmitigated
6.5.1 Peak Durations
Temporal patterns from Australian Rainfall and Runoff, Volume 2, (1987) have been adopted for
each storm duration. A range of storm durations were analysed to determine the peak discharge
for the catchment. Table 12 presents the flows generated using XP-RAFTS from design storms at
the proposed development site for the existing and developed (unmitigated) case scenarios.
Covey Associates Pty Ltd 10 Project No: 161968
Consulting Engineers 100415 Rpt Iss B
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLarge file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.