Skip to the record
Accept no substitutions.

Original source · versioned page text

Revised Stormwater Management Plan

Attached to the e-mail Response to Council information request - MCU16/0066 & OPW16/0133 - email 2 of 3.

Attached to the e-mail Response to SEQ Water Third Party Advice - MCU16/0066 & OPW16/0133.

of 42

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Plans and drawings

This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).

Log in to see the plans as drawn
                              STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Client: Hass Holdings ATF The Quasar Trust                                   Location: Taylor Court, Cooroy

6.3.6 Manning’s Values

Manning’s values varied due to the differing catchment characteristics / land uses and were
applied independently to the catchment. The values were generally adopted as follows:

     Pervious Area, n = 0.032; and
     Impervious Area, n = 0.018.

6.3.7 Catchment Slope

The Equal Area method was used to determine the catchment slope, which is summarised in
Table 8. The catchment slope in the developed case is unchanged from the existing case scenario.

6.3.8 Storm Durations

Standard storm durations of 15, 20, 25, 30, 45 60 and 90 minutes were modelled to estimate the
peak discharge.

6.4 Calibration

6.4.1 Rational Method

Rational Method calculations were undertaken for the site for calibration of the existing case XP-
RAFTS model – Table 10.
Variable         Value        Units
Area:            0.924        ha
Tc               5.9          minutes
C10              0.68         fraction

                                   Table 10 - Rational Method Calculations
                            Variable                1% AEP   10% AEP    39% AEP
                            Freq Factor              1.2       1.0        0.85
                            Intensity (mm/hr)       299.5     205.2      149.1
                            Discharge (m3/s)        0.628     0.358      0.221

The Rational Method Calculations for the 1%, 10% and 39% AEP events generally reflect results
from the XP-RAFTS model. Thus, the XP-RAFTS peak flows have been adopted for hydrological
modelling and detention sizing purposes. A comparison of the results is provided in Table 11.

                           Table 11 - XP-RAFTS and Rational Method Comparison
                                         Rational       XP-RAFTS       Difference
                             AEP          (m3/s)          (m3/s)           (%)
                              1%          0.628           0.630            0.4
                             10%          0.358           0.357            -0.4
                             39%          0.221           0.219            -1.1

6.5 Design Discharges Unmitigated

6.5.1 Peak Durations

Temporal patterns from Australian Rainfall and Runoff, Volume 2, (1987) have been adopted for
each storm duration. A range of storm durations were analysed to determine the peak discharge
for the catchment. Table 12 presents the flows generated using XP-RAFTS from design storms at
the proposed development site for the existing and developed (unmitigated) case scenarios.
Covey Associates Pty Ltd                         10                                      Project No: 161968
Consulting Engineers                                                                        100415 Rpt Iss B
Log in to download the original file

Revised Stormwater Management Plan.pdf · 4.6 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.