Original source · versioned page text
2016-09-06 Services & Organisation Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 27 of 47
Weighted Attribute Evaluation Spreadsheet
ContractNo: S15 16TOT ATTACHMENT 1
ant Maintenace and Servicing of Heating. Ventilation and Air
Conditioning Systems
PIC
(excl of GST)
based on
Hourly Rate Pricing
-6am-6pm
No. |NAME OF TENDERER Workdays ' % 2 x 4 4 ) x 3 % 1
1 [AimasterAustralaPlyltid ~~ S~C(S~S~S~S~S~S~SS Uewccagtle Vy Pe Poa Goad Very Geet Brtgten
2 [Climatecy SO
3 |ENGIE Mechanical Services (Qld) ST The ratings:
4 |Gealy's Airconditioning and Refngeration, SO + 0 (zero) = Unacceptable ~ a fat for that criteria and extreme risk
5 [Laguna Bay Airconditoning Cs + 20 (twenty) = Very Poor = the content of the submission for that criterta is of a low standard and hégh risk
+40 (forty) = Poor ~ the content of the submission fer that criteria ts unimpressive and poses a moderate risk
ee | + 60 (stety) * Good ~ the content of the submission for that criteria is meritabdle and will need to be monitored f awarded
De eee + 80 (eighty) * Very Good ~ the content of the submission for that criteria is of s high standard and advantageous
a 9 | + 100 (one-hundred) © Exceptional =the content of the submission for that criteria is flawless / outstanding and most advantageous
a 9 |
a | | Once all the data is entered the resultant scores based on the price and non price elements are automatically calculated for you
NON-CONFORMING TENDERS
Hirotec Maintenance (Donat evaluate Number of Tenders Evaluated == [6]
CEE EEE
1 2 3 4 5
Alrmaster Australia ENGIE Mechanical Gealy's Laguna Bay
PART A -Non price elements Airconditioning
Pty Ltd Services (Qid) and Refrigeration Airconditioning
Resultant Resultant Resultant
wegnting weigming weigming ghting ghbing
ContractExperience &Capacity | 5% | | 355 | 32 | | 4 | 46 | | 225 |
Mewocoon | | | Oe Pia | Pas
a | 3 | | 52 MB es | we | cs
Contribution to LocalEconomy | 10% | oo | a | 2 | oe | ss | wo | 2 |
Total Technical Score 60% p86 BS 8S
Normalised Technical Score (Th) |
\ T NGIE W ot q 5
PART B - Price element eee uid | _Stimatech__ | T sevices ald) | Akconditionina | Akcondiiontna |
Total Fees (Pc) 390) 380 0 >60 “* Primary work function under the Contract will be done under Hrly Rates, therefore
this pricing was deemed the most appropriate for the evaluation.
Average Fees (Pav) $0.00.
Price Score 87 99 103 99
Normalised Price Score (Pn) 77 89 92 89
Weighted Price Score (Pw
Total Score of price and non price
elements
OTHER DETAILS
Assesment panel member 1 — Facility Officer, Planning and Infrastructure
Assesment panel member 2 —_ Electrician, Planning and Infrastrucute The Contract Administrator confirms the above weightings
Assesment panelmember3 —HR Officer - WH&S, Executive Office Contract Administrator's signature:
Assesment panelmember4 = Building & Plumbing Services Manager, Planning and Infrastructure
Page 27 of 47See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.