Council archive · source document
_As Published -Change to Existing Approval & Extension to Relevant Period - 152006 862 02 - 1030538 · 152006.862.02
Officer: Denis Wallace
Direct Telephone: 53296239
Our Reference: 152006.862.02 (06/0862):
Your Reference: 0510L62NG
29 August 2014
Mr J Franz
C/- Martoo Consulting Pty Ltd
PO Box 1684
NOOSA HEADS QLD 4567
Dear Madam
Change to Existing Approval & Extension to Relevant Period
Sustainable Planning Act 2009
I refer to your request dated 30 April 2014 to make a permissible change to an existing
approval and to extend the relevant period for an existing approval granted on 22 March 2010.
On 28 August 2014, Council decided your requested changes.
Details of the decision are as follows:
1 APPLICATION DETAILS
Application No: 152006.862.02 (06/0862)
Street Address: 16 Riverpark Drive, Ringtail Creek Qld 4565
Real Property Description: Lot 26 SP 104706
Planning Scheme: The Noosa Plan (16 September 2013)
2 DECISION DETAILS
Council on 22 March 2010 decided to issue the following type of approval:
Development Permit to Reconfigure a Lot – 1 Lot into 2 Lots.
In relation to representations made, Council on 12 May 2010 decided to:
A. Refuse to change/delete conditions 11, 13 & 17
B. Amend Condition 2 to read as follows:
2. Pursuant to Section 3.5.21(2)(b) of the Integrated Planning Act 1997, the relevant
period is four (4) years from the day this permit takes effect and ends on 12 May
2014 during which time all conditions must have been complied with, operational
works completed, and the Plan of Survey lodged with the Council for endorsement,
unless an application to extend the relevant period is approved by Council.
C. Advise the applicant of Council’s decision.
D. Issue a Negotiated Decision Notice
In relation to the request to make a change to the existing approval, Council on 28 August
2014 decided to:
A. Delete Conditions 11 and 13.
Page 1 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 35 pages
Page 2
152006.862.02
B. Amend Conditions 10 & 29 to read as follows:
10. Prior to endorsement of the plan of survey by Council, a metes and bounds plan
shall be submitted to Council indicating the house site and effluent disposal area/s
on Lot 1 and Lot 2.
29. Refer to the Department of Natural Resources and Mines’ conditions included as
Attachment 1 in the Department of State Development, Infrastructure and
Planning’s letter dated 6 June 2014.
C. Delete the requirement for a further Development Permit for Operational Works –
Landscaping.
D. Agree to extend the relevant period by 4 months to 12 September 2014 and change
Condition 2 accordingly.
3 RELEVANT PERIOD OF APPROVAL
The relevant period for this Development Approval is identified in the Assessment Manager
conditions.
4 ASSESSMENT MANAGER CONDITIONS
Approved Plans
1 Development undertaken in accordance with this approval must generally comply with
the approved plan of development and as may be amended by these conditions. The
approved plan is:
Plan No. Rev. Plan Name Date
D-00510-01-J J Proposal Plan – Martoo Consulting 11/12/2008
Relevant Period
2 Pursuant to Section 3.5.21(2)(b) of the Integrated Planning Act 1997, the relevant period
is four (4) years from the day this permit takes effect and ends on 12 September 2014
during which time all conditions must have been complied with, operational works
completed, and the Plan of Survey lodged with the Council for endorsement, unless an
application to extend the relevant period is approved by Council.
General
3. The development must be undertaken and operated in a manner that causes no
detrimental effect upon the amenity of the neighbourhood by reason of the creation of
excessive noise, lighting nuisance or other emissions.
4. Any damage caused to any public utility during the course of construction shall be
repaired to Council’s standards and at no cost to Council.
5. Any alteration of any public utility or other facilities necessitated by the development of
the land or associated construction works external to the site shall be at no cost to
Council.
Fees
6 All outstanding rates and charges due and payable to Council in respect of the
reconfiguring of a lot shall be paid prior to endorsement of the Plan of Survey.
Page 2 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 3
152006.862.02
Plan of Survey
7 Prior to the endorsement of the Plan of Survey, the Applicant's Solicitor shall give
Council's Solicitor an appropriate undertaking in writing that in conjunction with
lodgement of the Plan of Survey at the Land Titles Office, the Title Deed, the
easement/s documents and any environmental covenant documents will also be lodged
and any additional Titles Office forms or requisitions requiring the consent of Council
being attended to forthwith.
8 In conjunction with the lodgement of the Plan of Survey for Council endorsement, all
legal documentation shall be presented to Council and shall be submitted in the correct
form with the fees prescribed in Council's adopted fee schedule.
9 Prior to Council endorsing the Plan of Survey, a certificate from a registered
Professional Civil Engineer shall be submitted to Council for each Development Permit
for Operational Works issued pursuant to this permit. The engineer shall certify those
works and that they have been completed in a workman like manner in accordance with
good engineering practice and in accordance with that permit.
10 Prior to endorsement of the plan of survey by Council, a metes and bounds plan shall be
submitted to Council indicating the house site and effluent disposal area/s on Lot 1 and
Lot 2.
11 Deleted.
Vegetation Covenant Area
12 An environmental covenant as defined by Part 6, Division 4A of the Land Title Act 1994,
shall be registered, in favour of Council, over land within Lot 2 within 50 metres of the
northeastern property boundary to the Noosa River. The environmental covenant shall
be for the protection of the Coastal Management District. The covenant area must be
lodged with Council and agreed to by Council prior to survey plan approval.
Vegetation Protection & Weed Removal
13 Deleted.
14 Prior to approval of the Operational Works (Landscaping) for the development, the
following requirements must be completed:
a. A total bond amount of 1.5 times the schedule of works estimate of costs (plus
GST) for the re-vegetation work, including maintenance for three years, must be
lodged
b. The bond will be released based on achieving the performance objectives and
criteria over the ‘on maintenance’ period in accordance with the approved
vegetation management and revegetation plan in the following increments:
i. 10% for the first year
ii. 10% for the second year
iii. 80% in the final year
15 Existing trees on site and within the road reserve are to be retained, except where
required to be removed due to a building approval or the conduct of an approved use.
16. Vegetation removal, tree felling and lopping shall be undertaken in an environmentally
sensitive manner to avoid damaging surrounding vegetation, trees and habitat. Cleared
vegetation is to be suitably processed by one of the following methods and removed
from the site:-
16.1. Processing through a woodchipper or shredder. The resulting mulch is to be
stockpiled loose in heaps of less than 1000 cubic metres, less than 2.5 metres
high with a minimum of 10 metres between edges of heaps.
Page 3 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 4
152006.862.02
16.2. Disposal for firewood.
16.3. Disposal for landscaping purposes.
16.4. Transport to alternative site for breaking down materials provided that all
necessary permits have been obtained to allow the alternate site to be used for
this purpose.
16.5. Re-use for construction materials.
16.6. Reproductive components of environmental weed species cleared from the site
shall not be mulched, with the material to be removed from the site and disposed
of in a Council approved refuse tip.
16.7. The disposal method for clearing works is to be submitted in conjunction with an
application for a Development Permit for Operational Work. The Applicant is
advised that other methods may be considered provided full details of the method
are submitted.
The Applicant is advised that burning off is an unacceptable method of disposal.
Access Driveway
17 A sealed driveway shall be professionally designed and constructed from the existing
road formation in Riverpark Drive, for the full length of the proposed 10m wide access
easement on proposed Lot 2. The driveway shall be designed and constructed in
accordance with Council’s standards and shall include with but not be limited to the
following:
17.1 Crossover in accordance with standard drawing SEQ R-050;
17.2 Have a minimum width of 4m on 4m formation;
17.3 Include any necessary drainage works to ensure no adverse impact on existing
drainage conditions or environment; and
17.4 Driveway curves have a minimum inner radius of 10 metres.
A Development Permit for Operational Works shall be required.
Stormwater Drainage
18 Any works associated with this development shall not adversely affect the existing
drainage conditions on the adjoining properties, the road, or the bushland by diverting
and/or blocking the natural overland runoff from these properties.
Earthworks
19 Any earthworks on site shall be in accordance with Council’s Planning Scheme Policy
PSP5 – Engineering Design Standards - Roads, Drainage and Earthworks and State
Planning Policy 2/02 Planning and Managing Development Involving Acid Sulfate Soils
and will require a Development Permit for Operational Works.
Power Supply
20 An electricity service shall be provided to each allotment if not already provided.
Page 4 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 5
152006.862.02
In this regard, an approved ENERGEX Electrical Design Consultant shall work in
conjunction with Council to prepare detailed designs of the electrical proposal.
The detailed deigns shall then be submitted to ENERGEX for approval and a copy of
their approval submitted to Council in conjunction with a “Certificate of Electricity Supply
for Proposed Subdivisions” (prepared by an approved ENERGEX Electrical Design
Consultant) prior to Council endorsing the Plan of Survey.
Any agreement with ENERGEX or an approved ENERGEX Electrical Design Consultant
shall be wholly at the applicant’s expense and shall not entail a financial encumbrance
on future purchasers of the proposed lots. A Development Permit for Operation Works
shall be required.
21 The requirements of ENERGEX shall be satisfied in relation to any existing or proposed
services that traverse this site or any other property in relation to providing electricity
service to this development site. Written confirmation by ENERGEX that satisfactory
arrangements have been made to formalise any required easements and/or existing
informal services shall be submitted prior to Council endorsing the Plan of Survey.
Telecommunication
22 The requirements for TELECOMMUNICATION services shall be satisfied in relation to
the provision of new telephone services to the proposed lots. In this regard written
confirmation from an approved telecommunication agency shall be submitted to the
Council prior to Council endorsing the Plan of Survey.
Effluent Disposal
23 The design and construction of any on-site effluent disposal system and disposal area
(land application area) shall be in accordance with Council’s Planning Scheme Policy
PSP24 - Effluent Disposal
Specifically, the land application area shall be positioned to achieve the greatest
possible setback to the dam/lake and to any permanent or intermittent watercourse.
The land application area shall also be positioned at least 15m from any underground
rainwater tanks.
Erosion and Sediment Control
24 Any person acting on this permit shall prevent erosion and sediment export from leaving
the site. Site control measures such as silt fencing, controlled gravel access to the site
and controlled disposal of waste, will be necessary.
In this regard, plans detailing the methods of controlling erosion and sediment are
required to be submitted to the Council for approval prior to obtaining a Development
Permit for Operational Works.
Compliance Bond
25 Prior to Council giving approval for Development Permit for Operational Works the
applicant shall submit $10,000 bond to ensure compliance with the conditions contained
within this approval. The bond will be returned following the acceptance of all works.
Infrastructure Contributions
26 The applicant must pay contributions towards trunk infrastructure in accordance with the
following Planning Scheme Policies and Council Policies:
(a) Planning Scheme Policy 12 – Public Open Space Contributions;
(b) Planning Scheme Policy 13 – Contributions in Lieu of Off Street Parking;
(c) Planning Scheme Policy 16 – Sewerage Headworks Contributions;
Page 5 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 6
152006.862.02
(d) Planning Scheme Policy 17 – Water Supply Headworks Contributions;
(e) Planning Scheme Policy 20 – Pathway Trunk Network Contributions;
(f) Council Policy – Rural Roadworks Contributions;
(g) Council Policy – Master Drainage Contributions.
For material change of use of premises approvals the contributions must be paid prior to
the commencement of use, for reconfiguring a lot approval contributions must be paid
prior to Council approval of the plan of subdivision.
The actual amount of the contribution must be calculated and paid in accordance with
the Planning Scheme Policies and variations due to indexation current at the time of
payment.
Further Permits Required
27. For the following classes of work associated with development, a Development Permit
for Operational Works must be obtained prior to commencement of works relating to that
class of work. The application may combine any or all of these classes of work:-
27.1. Access Driveway
27.2. Deleted
27.3. Erosion & Sediment Control
Concurrence Agency Conditions
28 Refer to the Department of Environment and Resource Management (Eco Access)
conditions in their letter dated 8 February 2010.
29 Refer to the Department of Natural Resources and Mines’ conditions included as
Attachment 1 in the Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning’s
letter dated 6 June 2014
5 REFERRAL AGENCY CONDITIONS
The referral agencies applicable to this application are:
Referral Trigger Referral Referral Agency Referral Address
Status
Concurrence Dept of Natural PO Box 573
Resources & Water Nambour Qld 4560
(DERM)
Concurrence Environmental Protection PO Box 168
Agency (DERM) Cotton Tree Qld 4558
Advice DPI & Fisheries PO Box 5165
Nambour Qld 4560
A copy of any referral agency conditions is attached.
6 APPROVED PLANS/DOCUMENTS
The approved plans and / or documents for this development approval are listed in the
following table:
Plan / Document Rev. Plan / Document Name Date
No.
D-00510-01-J J Proposal Plan – Martoo Consulting 11/12/2008
Page 6 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 7
152006.862.02
7 ADVISORY NOTES
The following Advisory Notes are for information purposes only and do not form conditions of
approval:
1. For the purpose of these conditions, the following definitions apply: -
1.1. A Plan of Survey means the plan for the reconfiguration of a lot required to be
endorsed by Council pursuant to S3.7.1 of the Integrated Planning Act 1997.
1.2. A Registered Professional Civil Engineer means an engineer who is
registered with the board of Professional Engineers of Queensland.
1.3. The person acting on this permit means any person or company who
undertakes development pursuant to this permit.
2. As the site is located partly located below 5m AHD, any excavation works consisting of
100m3 or greater and/or any filling works consisting of 500m3 or greater and with an
average depth of 0.5m or greater below 5mAHD will need to be carried out in
accordance with State Planning Policy 2/02 Planning and Managing Development
Involving Acid Sulfate Soils. In this regard appropriate testing and supporting
documentation prepared by a suitably qualified specialist shall be submitted to Council
for approval prior to obtaining a Development Permit for Operational Works.
3. The applicant is advised that a Compliance Permit for all plumbing and drainage works
within the boundaries of the development site shall be obtained from Council’s
Plumbing Services Section prior to obtaining a Development Permit for Building Works.
4. Any building or clearing works on the proposed allotments should take into
consideration that the remnant bushland vegetation on these lots, subject to the
provisions of Local Law 10 – Vegetation Management (2003) and The Noosa Plan’s
Biodiversity Overlay Code.
Infrastructure Contributions and Infrastructure Charge
5. An advice notice outlining the estimated infrastructure contributions payable and the
basis for their calculation under the current Planning Scheme Policies and Council
Policies is attached with this Development Permit.
6. For properties located in the catchment area for the Coastal Major Road Network
Infrastructure Charges Plan, this development permit may trigger an Infrastructure
Charge to be issued in accordance with the Infrastructure Charges Plan and Chapter
5 of the “Integrated Planning Act 1997”.
7. Please contact Council's Infrastructure Charges Officer (email:
[email protected]) a minimum of 5 business days prior to payment of
the infrastructure contributions and/or charge notice so a payment advice detailing the
amounts applicable at the time of payment may be issued to accompany the payment.
8. Payment of infrastructure contributions and/or infrastructure charge notices will not be
accepted by credit card transaction.
Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003
9. There may be a requirement to establish a Cultural Heritage Management Plan and/or
obtain approvals pursuant to the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 (ACH Act).
The ACH Act establishes a cultural heritage duty of care which provides that: “A
person who carries out an activity must take all reasonable and practicable measures
to ensure the activity does not harm Aboriginal cultural heritage”. It is an offence to fail
to comply with the duty of care. Substantial monetary penalties may apply to
individuals or corporations breaching this duty of care. Injunctions may also be issued
Page 7 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 8
152006.862.02
by the Land and Resources Tribunal, and the Minister administering the ACH Act can
also issue stop orders for an activity that is harming or is likely to harm Aboriginal
cultural heritage or the cultural heritage value of Aboriginal cultural heritage.
You should contact the Cultural Heritage Co-ordination Unit on 07 3238 3838 to discuss
any obligations under the ACH Act.
8 PROPERTY NOTES
The following property notes will be placed against the subject property in Council’s property
record system:
1. The Applicant is advised that the following or a similar property notation shall be
placed on the Council’s rates records for the proposed Lot 2 to advise prospective
purchasers of Council's requirements regarding the Coastal Management District:-
a. A Vegetation Covenant is registered over this lot to protect the Coastal
Management District. The covenant includes the Sunshine Coast Regional
Council as Covenantee and references Queensland Land Title Registry Standard
Terms Document No. 811674742 (Council References 06/0862).
2. The Applicant is advised that the following or a similar property notation shall be
placed on the Council’s rates records for the proposed Lot 1 and Lot 2 to advise
prospective purchasers of Council's requirements regarding effluent disposal:-
a. “No connection is available to town water supply”
b. “The property is in an unsewered area. You are advised that the preliminary
investigation for this site indicated that an advance secondary wastewater
treatment plant may be required. Effluent shall be disposed of on-site in
accordance with Council’s policy for on-site wastewater disposal current at the
time of Building Works. A detailed site assessment and effluent land application
design will be required to be submitted to Council at the time of an application for
a Development Permit for Building Works or modifications to the effluent disposal
system.”
c. “A specific a house site and effluent disposal has been specified for the property”.
9 PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OVERRIDING SCHEME
Not applicable.
10 FURTHER DEVELOPMENT PERMITS REQUIRED
Type of Development Permit required Subject of the required Development Permit
Operational Works Access Driveway
Erosion & Sediment Control
11 SELF ASSESSABLE CODES
Not applicable.
12 SUBMISSIONS
Not applicable.
13 REASONS / GROUNDS FOR APPROVAL DESPITE CONFLICT WITH SCHEME
Not applicable.
Page 8 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 9
152006.862.02
14 RIGHTS OF APPEAL
You are entitled to appeal against this decision. A copy of the relevant appeal provisions from
the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 is attached.
15 OTHER DETAILS
If you wish to obtain more information about Council’s decision, electronic copies of which are
available on line at www.noosa.qld.gov.au, or at Council offices.
DECISION NOTICE HISTORY
Original Decision Notice 22 March 2010
Negotiated Decision Notice 12 May 2010, with an
amendment to condition 2
Changes to an Existing Approval & Extension to
Relevant Period 28 August 2014, with an amendment to
conditions 10 & 2 and, the deletion of conditions 11 & 13.
Yours faithfully
Kerri Coyle
Manager Planning & Environment
Encl. Infrastructure Agreement
Appeal Rights
cc: Unitywater
Page 9 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 10
152006.862.02
Appeal Rights
SUSTAINABLE PLANNING ACT 2009 & SUSTAINABLE PLANNING
REGULATION 2009
The following is an extract from the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (Chapter 7)
465 Appeals about decisions relating to extensions for approvals
(1) For a development approval given for a development application, a person to whom a notice is given under
section 389, other than a notice for a decision under section 386(2), may appeal to the court against the decision
in the notice.
(2) The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the notice of the decision is given to the
person.
(3) Also, a person who has made a request under section 383 may appeal to the court against a deemed refusal of
the request.
(4) An appeal under subsection (3) may be started at any time after the last day the decision on the matter should
have been made.
466 Appeals about decisions relating to permissible changes
(1) For a development approval given for a development application, the following persons may appeal to the court
against a decision on a request to make a permissible change to the approval—
(a) if the responsible entity for making the change is the assessment manager for the application—
(i) the person who made the request; or
(ii) an entity that gave a notice under section 373 or a pre-request response notice about the
request;
(b) if the responsible entity for making the change is a concurrence agency for the application—the person
who made the request.
(2) The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the person is given notice of the decision on
the request under section 376.
(3) Also, a person who has made a request under section 369 may appeal to the court against a deemed refusal of
the request.
(4) An appeal under subsection (3) may be started at any time after the last day the decision on the matter should
have been made.
Page 10 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 11
152006.862.02
Referral Agency Conditions
SUSTAINABLE PLANNING ACT 2009 & SUSTAINABLE PLANNING
REGULATION 2009
Page 11 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 12
152006.862.02
Page 12 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
[OCR of page images]
152006.862.02
ecoaccess
emaronmental hicences and permits
Notice
Concurrence Agency Response
Recommendation
- Granted with conditions
DERM Ref Number
- 1IPCC01443109
Aspect of Development
- Advice Agency Response on land in or within 100m of a wetland
Details
- As above
Recommendation
- Advice
DERM Ref Number
~ IPARO1443009
3. Currency period
This approval will lapse unless substantially started within the currency period/s set by the Assessment
Manager OR the standard currency periods stated in section 3.5 21 of the integrated Planning Act
1997 applying to each aspect of development in this approval AND/OR the following currency penods
applying to aspects of development in this approval
This approval will lapse unless substantially started within two years.
4. The approved plans
The approved plans and/or documents for this approval are (attachment 1)
Plan/Document No. Plan/Document Name Date
D-00510-01-K Lots 25 & 26 on SP104706 Parish of Noosa County of 42/03/09
March Subdivision of a Lot - Proposal Plan
5. Codes for self-assessable development
Any self-assessable development for an environmentally relevant activity conducted in conjunction
with this approval, must comply with the relevant code of environmental compliance
6. Assessment Manager Responsibilities
Please note that it is a requirement under Sections 3.5.15 and 3.5.17 of the Integrated Planning Act 1997
that a copy of the final Decision Notice (which includes DERM's concurrence response) for this application
issued by the Sunshine Coast Regional Council, be forwarded to each referral agency Therefore could you
please send a signed hardcopy to the DERM's Ecoaccess Customer Service Unit, PO Box 15155 CITY
EAST 4002 and an electronic copy to [email protected]
Page 2 of 4 * AF080109 Department of Environment and Resource Management
P;
Document Set ID: 19816636 age 12 of 36
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 13
152006.862.02
Page 13 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
[OCR of page images]
152006.862.02
ecoaccess
environmental licences and perms
Notice
Concurrence Agency Response
Native Title
Document Set ID: 19816636
In addition, the State’s Native Title Work Procedures indicate that responsibility for assessment of native title
issues for an IDAS application rest with the Assessment Manager Therefore in this instance, DERM has not
provided a notification to native title parties.
Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003
DERM also takes this opportunity to advise the Assessment Manager of the responsibilities of applicants
under the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003. The Assessment Manager may wish to include this
information as an Advisory Note on the Decision Notice issued for the application.
Under section 23 of the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 a person who carries out an activity must take
all reasonable and practicable measures to ensure the activity does not harm Aboriginal cultural heritage
(the “cultural heritage duty of care"). Maximum penalties for breactung the duty of care are $750,000 for a
corporation and $75,000 for an individual.
Applicants will comply with the duty of care in relation to Aboriginal cultural heritage if they are acting in
accordance with cultural heritage duty of care guidelines gazetted under the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act
2003, available on the DERM website, or in accordance with an agreement with the Aboriginal party for the
area or a cultural heritage management plan approved under part 7 of the Abonginal Cultural Hentage Act
2003.
Applicants are also encouraged to undertake a search of the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Database and the
Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Register, administered by the Cultural Heritage Coordination Unit, DERM.
Application forms to undertake a free search of the Cultural Heritage Register and the Database may be
obtained by contacting the Cultural Heritage Coordination Unit on (07) 3238 3838 or on the DERM website
www.DERM ald gov au/cultural_heritage
If you require more information, please contact Jessica Johnson, the Project Manager, on the telephone
number listed below
Yours sincerely
‘ of lee 10.
Signature Date
Ben Sale Enquiries.
Manager (Sunshine Coast} ES - Reg Serv - Bne North Region- Sunshine
Environmental Services North Coast - DERM
South East Region PO Box 168
Department of Environment and Resource Management COTTON TREE QLD 4558
Phone: (07) 5459 6141
Fax: (07) 5443 9927
Attached — Approved Plans
Enclosed — Permit number: 1PCC01443109 and Advice: IPARO1443009
Page 3 of 4 » AFO80109 Department of Environment and Resource Management
Page 13 of 36
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 14
152006.862.02
Page 14 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
[OCR of page images]
152006.862.02
ecoaccessS
environmental icences and permits
Attachment 1 - Approved Plans
Notice
Concurrence Agency Response
D-00510-01-K — Lots 25 & 26 on SP104706 Parish of Noosa County of March: Subdivision of a Lot -
Proposal Plan dated 12/03/09
McKINNON DR
iN ij ey |
ht
Page 4 of 4 + AF080109
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Department of Environment and Resource Management
Page 14 of 36
Page 15
152006.862.02
Page 15 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
[OCR of page images]
152006.862.02
Section 3.3.16 and 3.3.18 Integrated Planning Act 1997
Department of Environment and Resource Management Permit’ number:
Coastal Protection and Management Act 1995; and
any subordinate legislation
IPCC01443109
Permit’ number: IPCC01443109
Assessment Manager reference: 2006/0862
Date application received by DERM: 23 March 2009
Permit' Type: Concurrence Response for Operational Work
Decision: Granted with conditions
Applicant: Sunshine Coast Regional Council
Relevant Laws and Policies: Integrated Planning Act 1997,
Jurisdiction: Schedule 2, Table 2, item 13 of the integrated Planning
Regulation 1998
Development Description
Property Lot/Plan Aspect of Description of works
Development
1270 McKinnon Lot 26 on Concurrence One lot into two
Drive, Ringtail SP104706 Response
Creek, QLD Reconfiguring of a Lot]
that ts land situated
completely or partly
within a coastal
management district
Reasons for inclusion of development conditions
In accordance with section 3,3,18(8) of the Integrated Planning Act 1997 and section 27B of the Acts
Interpretation Act 1954, the reasons for the inclusion of development conditions are.
The Department of Environmental Resource Management (DERM) ts a concurrence agency under the
Integrated Planning Regulation 1998 for coastal management under the Coastal Protection and
Management Act 1995, excluding amenity or aesthetic significance or value
* Permit includes licences, approvals, permits, authorisations, certificates, sanctions or equivalent/similar as
required by legislation administered by DERM.
Page 1 of 4
Department of Environment and Resource Management
. WWW derm.qid gov.au ABN 46 640 294 485
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 15 of 36
Page 16
152006.862.02
Page 16 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
[OCR of page images]
152006.862.02
Permit number: 1PCC01443109
Additional information for applicants
Contaminated Land
It is a requirement of the Environmental Protection Act 1994 that ff an owner or occupier of land becomes aware
a Notifiable Activity (as defined by Schedule 3 of the Environmental Protection Act 1994) 1s being carried out on
the land or that the land has been affected by a hazardous contaminant, they must, within 22 days after
becoming so aware, give notice to DERM
Yours sincerely
| Bk ¥[orfio.
Signature Date
Ben Sale Enquiries.
Manager (Sunshine Coast) ES - Reg Serv - Bne North Region- Sunshine
Environmental Services North Coast - DERM
South East Region PO Box 168
Department of Environment and Resource Management COTTON TREE QLD 4558
Phone: (07) 5459 6141
Fax. (07) 5443 9927
Page 2 of 4 Department of Environment and Resource Management
Page 16 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 17
152006.862.02
Page 17 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
[OCR of page images]
152006.862.02
Permit number: IPCC01443109
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Agency Interest - General
1. The Coastal Management District ts to remain free from all development and surrendered under an
environmental covenant to ensure the area remains free from future development
2. The Coastal Management District must be maintained to be free of grazing animals and weed species
under the environmental covenant
3. Any activities conducted on site, relevant to this reconfiguration of a lot must not result in impacts to the
Coastal Management District
END OF CONDITIONS
Page 3 of 4 . Department of Environment and Resource Management .
Page 17 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 18
152006.862.02
Page 18 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
[OCR of page images]
152006.862.02
Document Set ID: 19816636
Permit number: IPCC01443109
DEFINITIONS
Words and phrases used throughout this permit' are defined below Where a definition for a term used in this
permit’ is sought and the term ts not defined within this permit’ the definitions provided in the relevant legislation
shall be used
“administering authority" means the Department of Environment and Resource Management or its
successor
“approval” means ‘notice of development application decision’ or ‘notice of concurrence agency response’
under the /ntegrated Planning Act 1997
“approved plans" means the plans and documents listed in the approved plans section in the notice attached
to this development approval
“Coastal management district”
¢ Landward boundary !s a line measured 40 metres landward of the plan position of the mean high water
springs tide level except where approved revetments exist, in which case the line is measured 10
metres landward of the upper seaward edge of the revetment, irrespective of the presence of
outcropping bedrock, or
e Landward boundary ts the plan position of Highest Astronomical Tide,
Whichever provides the greater width
“site” means land or tidal waters on or in which it is proposed to carry out the development approved under this
development approval
“works” or “operation” means the development approved under this development approval.
END OF CONDITIONS
Page 4 of 4 Department of Environment and Resource Management
Page 18 of 36
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 19
152006.862.02
Page 19 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
[OCR of page images]
152006.862.02
Department of Environment and Resource Management — Advice:
IPAR01443009
Permit' number: IPAR01443009
Assessment Manager reference: 2006/0862
Date application received by DERM: 23 March 2009
Advice: Land in or within 100m of a wetland
Applicant: Sunshine Coast Regional Council
Relevant Laws and Policies: Integrated Planning Act 1997,
Coastal Protection and Management Act 1995; and
any subordinate legislation
Jurisdiction: Schedule 2, Table 2, Item 38 of the Integrated Planning
Regulation 1998
Development Description
Property Lot/Plan Aspect of Description of works
Development
1270 McKinnon Lot 26 on Advice Agency One lot into two
Drive, Ringtail SP104706 Response on land in
Creek, QLD or within 100m of a
wetland
Advice offered
The Department of Environment and Resource Management (DERM) encourages Sunshine Coast Regional
Council (SCRC), as the assessment manger, to require as large a separation as possible between the buildings
within the proposed Lot 2 and the mapped wetland boundary, taking into consideration the site constraints.
DERM also encourages SCRC to impose an environmental covenant over the land, in the absence of DERM’s
consideration of land surrender, to ensure the values of this area are protected inline with the State Coastal
Management Plan 2001.
Yours sincerely
RAK OX[o2-{,0.
Signature a Dato
Ben Sale Enquiries:
Manager (Sunshine Coast) ES - Reg Serv - Bne North Region- Sunshine
Environmental Services North Coast - DERM
South East Region PO Box 168
Department of Environment and Resource Management COTTON TREE QLD 4558
Phone: (07) 5459 6141
Fax: (07) 5443 9927
Page 1 of 1
Department of Environment and Resource Management
www.derm gid gov.au ABN 46 640 294 485
Page 19 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 20
152006.862.02
Page 20 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
[OCR of page images]
152006.862.02
Queensland
Government
Department of
State Development,
Infrastructure and Planning
SARA reference: SPD-0414-6764
Council reference: 2006/862
Date: 6 June 2014
Mr J Franz
c/- Martoo Consulting
PO Box 1684
Noosa Heads QLD 4567
Notice of decision—changed approval (responsible entity)
1270 McKinnon Drive, Ringtail Creek — QLD 4565
(Given under section 376 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009)
The Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning received
representations under section 369 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (SPA) on 24 April
2014 for the original decision described below.
_ Applicant details
Applicant name: Mr J Franz
c/- Martoo Consulting
PO Box 1684
Noosa Heads QLD 4567
Site details
Real property description: 26 SP104706
Local government area: Noosa Shire Council
Original decision
Date of original decision: 12 May 2010
Original decision details: Approved subject to conditions
A changed decision notice for this request is attached.
Copies of the following documents are also attached:
e relevant appeal provisions in the Sustainable Planning Act 2009
* any plans and specifications approved in relation to the decision notice.
Page 20 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 21
152006.862.02
Page 21 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
[OCR of page images]
152006.862.02
SPD-0414-6764
If you require any further information, please contact Tracey Smith, A/Senior Planning
Officer, on 3882 8409 or [email protected] who will be pleased to assist.
Yours sincerely
Garth Nolan
Manager (Planning)
enc:
Attachment 1—Changed Concurrence agency conditions
Attachment 2—SPA appeal provisions
Changed decision notice
Referral agency response plan
Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning Page 2 of 3
Page 21 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 22
152006.862.02
Page 22 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
[OCR of page images]
152006.862.02
SARA reference: SPD-0414-6764
Council reference: 2006/862
Changed decision notice
SPD-0414-6764
(Given under section 376 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009)
Applicant details
Applicant name:
Applicant contact details:
Application details
Mr J Franz
c/- Martoo Consulting
PO Box 1684
Noosa Heads QLD 4567
Level of assessment:
Code assessment
Nature of the changes
Date of request for change: 24 April 2014
Site details
Street address: 1270 McKinnon Drive, Ringtail Creek - QLD 4565
Real property description:
Site area:
26 SP104706
62.3 ha
The nature of the changes agreed to are to remove conflict with the existing material
change of use approval.
Original decision
Date of original decision:
Original decision details:
Changed decision
17 May 2010
Approved subject to conditions
Date of changed decision:
Changed decision details:
Conditions
6 June 2014
Approved subject to conditions
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
This approval is subject to:
e the changed concurrence agency conditions in Attachment 1
Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning
Page 3 of 3
Page 22 of 36
Page 23
152006.862.02
Page 23 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
[OCR of page images]
152006.862.02
SPD-0414-6764
Aspects of development and development approval granted
Aspect 1: Reconfiguring a Lot — Subdivision (1 into 2 lots)
Rights of appeal
The rights of applicants to appeal to the Planning and Environment Court against
decisions about a development application are set out in chapter 7, part 1, division 8 of
the Sustainable Planning Act 2009. For particular applications, there may also be a right
to appeal to the Building and Development Dispute Resolution Committee (see chapter 7,
Part 2 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009).
Copies of the relevant appeal provisions are attached,
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning Page 4 of 3
Page 23 of 36
Page 24
152006.862.02
Page 24 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
[OCR of page images]
152006.862.02
SPD-0414-6764
SARA reference: SPD-0414-6764
Council reference: 2006/862
Attachment 1—Changed concurrence agency conditions
No. Conditions of development approval Condition timing
Reconfiguring a lot
Clearing vegetation—Pursuant to section 255D of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, the chief
executive administering the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 nominates the Director-General of the
Department of Natural Resources and Mines to be the assessing authority for the development to
which this development approval relates for the administration and enforcement of any matter
relating to the following condition(s):
Concurrence agency response
+—AlLresidenses-and associated buildings are te be setback forty-meu Fnore-from-remnant
vegetation shown-oa the Annoiates Ste Plan,
AM: i Act-4999-and
Clearing of native vegetation as a result of this reconfiguring a lot development must not occur on
the land within the area shown as Area A on Referral Agency Response (Vegetation) Plan RARP-
SPD-0414-006764,unless the clearing is—
« Residential clearing as defined under the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009.
« Essential management clearing including firebreaks associated with new infrastructure.
« One access track/ driveway to service the single residence.
« By fire under the Fire and Rescue Service Act 1990 to reduce hazardous fuel loads or an
activity under the Fire and Rescue Service Act 1990, section 53, 68 or 69; or
«Where it is necessary to remove or reduce the imminent risk that the vegetation poses to
serious personal injury or damage to property.
Attachment: Referral Agency Response (Vegetation) Plan-RARP SPD-0414-006764
Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning Page 5 of 3
Document Set ID: 19816636 Page 24 of 36
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 25
152006.862.02
Page 25 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
[OCR of page images]
152006.862.02
SPD-0414-6764
SARA reference: SPD-0414-6764
Council reference: 2006/862
Attachment 2—SPA Appeal Provisions
Sustainable Planning Act 2009—Representation and appeal
provisions
The following relevant appeal provisions are provided in accordance with s336(a) of the
Sustainable Planning Act 2009.
[ Chapter 6 Integrated development assessment system (IDAS) |
Part 8 Dealing with decision notices and approvals
Division 1 Changing decision notices and approvals during applicant’s appeal period
360 Application of div 1
This division applies only during the applicant's appeal period.
361 Applicant may make representations about decision
(1) The applicant may make written representations to the assessment manager about—
(a) a matter stated in the decision notice, other than a refusal or a matter about
which a concurrence agency told the assessment manager under section 287(1)
or (5); or
(b) the standard conditions applying to a deemed approval.
(2) However, the applicant can not make representations under subsection (1)(a) about a
condition attached to an approval. under the-direction of the-Minister. - ” -
362 Assessment manager to consider representations
The assessment manager must consider any representations made to the
assessment manager under section 361.
363 Decision about representations
(1) If the assessment manager agrees with any of the representations about a decision
notice or a deemed approval, the assessment manager must give a new decision
notice (the negotiated decision notice) to—
{a) the applicant; and
(b) each principal submitter; and
(c) each referral agency; and
(d) if the assessment manager is not the local government and the development is
in a local government area—the local government.
(2) Before the assessment manager agrees to a change under this section, the
assessment manager must consider the matters the assessment Manager was
required to consider in assessing the application, to the extent the matters are
relevant.
(3) Only 1 negotiated decision notice may be given.
(4) The negotiated decision notice—
{a) must be given within 5 business days after the day the assessment manager
agrees with the representations; and
(b) must comply with section 335; and
(c) must state the nature of the changes; and
(d) replaces—
(i) the decision notice previously given; or
Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning Page 6 of 3
Page 25 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 26
152006.862.02
Page 26 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
[OCR of page images]
152006.862.02
SPD-0414-6764
(ii) if a decision notice was not previously given and the negotiated decision
notice relates to a deemed approval—the standard conditions applying to
the deemed approval.
(5) If the assessment manager does not agree with any of the representations, the
assessment manager must, within 5 business days after the day the assessment
manager decides not to agree with any of the representations, give written notice to
the applicant stating the decision about the representations.
364 Giving new notice about charges for infrastructure
(1) This section applies if the development approved by the negotiated decision notice is
different from the development approved in the decision notice or deemed approval in
a way that affects the amount of an infrastructure charge, regulated infrastructure
charge or adopted infrastructure charge.
The local government may give the applicant a new infrastructure charges notice
under section 633, regulated infrastructure charges notice under section 643 or
adopted infrastructure charges notice under section 648F to replace the original
notice.
(2)
366 Applicant may suspend applicant's appeal period
(1) If the applicant needs more time to make the representations, the applicant may, by
written notice given to the assessment manager, suspend the applicant's appeal
period.
(2) The applicant may act under subsection (1) only once.
(3) If the representations are not made within 20 business days after the day written
notice was given to the assessment manager, the balance of the applicant's appeal
period restarts.
(4) If the representations are made within 20 business days after the day written notice
was given to the assessment manager—
(a) if the applicant gives the assessment manager a notice withdrawing the notice
under subsection (1)—the balance of the applicant's appeal period restarts the
day after the assessment manager receives the notice of withdrawal; or
(b) if the assessment manager gives the applicant a notice under section 363(5)—
the balance of the applicant's appeal period restarts the day after the applicant
receives the notice; or
(c) if the assessment manager gives the applicant a negotiated decision notice—the
applicant's appeal.
[ Chapter 7 Appeals, offences and enforcement
Part 1 Planning and Environment Court
Division 8 Appeals to court relating to development applications and approvals
461 Appeals by applicants
(4) An applicant for a development application may appeal to the court against any of the
following—
(a) the refusal, or the refusal in part, of the development application;
(b) any condition of a development approval, another matter stated in a
development approval and the identification or inclusion of a code under section
242;
(c) the decision to give a preliminary approval when a development permit was
applied for;
{d) the length of a period mentioned in section 344;
(2) adeemed refusal of the development application.
(2) An appeal under subsection (1)(a), (b), (c) or (d) must be started within 20 business
days (the applicant’s appeal period) after—
Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning Page 7 of 3
Document Set ID: 19816636 Page 26 of 36
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 27
152006.862.02
Page 27 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
[OCR of page images]
152006.862.02
SPD-0414-6764
(a) ifa decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given—the day the decision
notice or negotiated decision notice is given to the applicant; or
(b) otherwise—the day a decision notice was required to be given to the applicant.
(3) An appeal under subsection (1)(e) may be started at any time after the last day a
decision on the matter should have been made.
462 Appeals by submitters—general
(1) A submitter for a development application May appeal to the court only against—
(a) the part of the approval relating to the assessment manager's decision about any
part of the application requiring impact assessment under section 31 4; or
(b) the part of the approval relating to the assessment manager's decision under
section 327.
(2) To the extent an appeal may be made under subsection (1), the appeal may be
against 1 or more of the following—
(a) the giving of a development approval;
{b) any provision of the approval including—
(i) acondition of, or lack of condition for, the approval; or
(it) the length of a period mentioned in section 341 for the approval.
(3) However, a submitter may not appeal if the submitter—
(a) withdraws the submission before the application is decided; or
(b) has given the assessment manager a notice under section 339(1)(b\(ii).
(4) The appeal must be started within 20 business days (the submitter’s appeal period)
after the decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given to the submitter.
463 Additional and extended appeal rights for submitters for particular development
applications
(1) This section applies to a development application to which chapter 9, part 7 applies.
(2) A submitter of a properly made submission for the application may appeal to the court
about a referral agency's response made by a concurrence agency for the
applicatio: ec
(3) However, th itter may Only appeal against a referral agency's response to the
extent it relates to—
(a) development for an aquacultural ERA; or
(b) development that is—
{i) amaterial change of use of premises for aquaculture; or
(ii) operational work that is the removal, damage or destruction of a marine
plant.
{3) Despite section 462(1), the submitter may appeal against the following matters for the
application even if the matters relate to code assessment—
(a) adecision about a matter mentioned in section 462(2) if itis a decision of the
chief executive;
(b) a referral agency’s response mentioned in subsection (2).
464 Appeals by advice agency submitters
(1) Subsection (2) applies if an advice agency, in its response for an application, told the
assessment manager to treat the response as a properly made submission.
(2) The advice agency may, within the limits of its jurisdiction, appeal to the court
about—
(a) any part of the approval relating to the assessment manager's decision about
any part of the application requiring impact assessment under section 314; or
(b) any part of the approval relating to the assessment manager's decision under
section 327.
(3) The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the decision notice
or negotiated decision notice is given to the advice agency as a submitter.
(4) However, if the advice agency has given the assessment manager a notice under
section 339(1)(b)(ii), the advice agency may not appeal the decision.
Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning Page 8 of 3
Page 27 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 28
152006.862.02
Page 28 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
[OCR of page images]
152006.862.02
SPD-0414-6764
465 Appeals about decisions relating to extensions for approvals
(1) For a development approval given for a development application, a person to whom a
notice is given under section 389, other than a notice for a decision under section
386(2), may appeal to the court against the decision in the notice.
(2) The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the notice of the
decision is given to the person.
(3) Also, a person who has made a request under section 383 may appeal to the court
against a deemed refusal of the request.
(4) An appeal under subsection (3) may be started at any time after the last day the
decision on the matter should have been made.
466 Appeals about decisions relating to permissible changes
(1) For a development approval given for a development application, the following
persons may appeal to the court against a decision on a request to make a
permissible change to the approval—
(a) if the responsible entity for making the change is the assessment manager for
the application—
(i) the person who made the request; or
(ii) an entity that gave a notice under section 373 or a pre-request response
notice about the request;
(b) if the responsible entity for making the change is a concurrence agency for the
application—the person who made the request.
(2) The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the person is given
notice of the decision on the request under section 376.
(3) Also, a person who has made a request under section 369 may appeal to the court
against a deemed refusal of the request.
(4) An appeal under subsection (3) may be started at any time after the last day the
decision on the matter should have been made.
467 Appeals about changing or cancelling conditions imposed by assessment
"Manager orconcurrence agency =—=———ss——i‘“s;s*s*s*~*:”:”””CCS
(1) Aperson to whom a notice under section 378(9)(b) giving a decision to change or
cancel a condition of a development approval has been given may appeal to the court
against the decision in the notice.
(2) The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the notice of the
decision is given to the person.
Division 11 Making and appeal to Court
481 How appeals to the court are started
(1) An appeal is started by lodging written notice of appeal with the registrar of the court.
(2) The notice of appeal must state the grounds of the appeal.
(3) The person starting the appeal must also comply with the rules of the court applying
to the appeal.
(4) However, the court may hear and decide an appeal even if the person has not
complied with subsection (3).
482 Notice of appeal to other parties—development applications and approvals
(1) An appellant under division 8 must give written notice of the appeal to—
(a) if the appellant is an applicant—
(i) the chief executive; and
(ii) the assessment manager; and
(ili) any concurrence agency; and
{iv) any principal submitter whose submission has not been withdrawn; and
(v) any advice agency treated as a submitter whose submission has not been
withdrawn; or
Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning Page 9 of 3
P;
Document Set ID: 19816636 age 28 of 36
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 29
152006.862.02
Page 29 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
[OCR of page images]
152006.862.02
(2)
@)
SPD-0414-6764
(b) if the appellant is a submitter or an advice agency whose response to the
development application is treated as a submission for an appeal—
(i) the chief executive; and
(i) the assessment manager; and
(ii) any referral agency; and
{iv) the applicant; or
{c) if the appellant is a person to whom a notice mentioned in section 465(1) has
been given—
(i) the chief executive; and
(ii) the assessment manager for the development application to which the
notice relates; and
(iii) any entity that was a concurrence agency for the development application to
which the notice relates; and
(iv) the person who made the request under section 383 to which the notice
relates, if the person is not the appellant; or
(d)_ if the appellant is a person mentioned in section 466(1)—
(i) the chief executive; and
(ii) the responsible entity for making the change to which the appeal relates;
and
(iii) the person who made the request to which the appeal relates under section
369, if the person is not the appellant; and
(iv) if the responsible entity is the assessment manager—any entity that was a
Concurrence agency for the development application to which the notice of
the decision on the request relates; or
(e) if the appellant is a person to whom a notice mentioned in section 487 has been
given—the entity that gave the notice.
The notice must be given within—
(a) if the appellant is a submitter or advice agency whose response to the
development application is treated as a submission for an appeal—z2 business
days after the appeal is started; or
(b)—otherwise—10-business-days-after the appeal is st
The notice must state—
(a) the grounds of the appeal; and
(b) if the person given the notice is not the respondent or a co-respondent under
section 485—that the person may, within 10 business days after the notice is
given, elect to become a co-respondent to the appeal by filing in the court a
notice of election in the approved form.
485 Respondent and co-respondents for appeals under div 8
(1)
Subsections (2) to (8) apply for appeals under sections 461 to 464,
The assessment manager is the respondent for the appeal.
If the appeal is started by a submitter, the applicant is a co-respondent for the
appeal.
Any submitter may elect to become a co-respondent for the appeal.
If the appeal is about a concurrence agency's response, the concurrence agency is
a co-respondent for the appeal.
If the appeal is only about a concurrence agency's response, the assessment
Manager may apply to the court to withdraw from the appeal,
The respondent and any co-respondents for an appeal are entitled to be heard in
the appeal as a party to the appeal.
A person to whom a notice of appeal is required to be given under section 482 and
who is not the respondent or a co-respondent for the appeal may elect to be a co-
respondent.
For an appeal under section 465—
(a) the assessment manager is the respondent; and
Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning Page 10 of 3
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 29 of 36
Page 30
152006.862.02
Page 30 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
[OCR of page images]
152006.862.02
SPD-0414-6764
(b) if the appeal is started by a concurrence agency that gave the assessment
manager a notice under section 3885—the person asking for the extension the
subject of the appeal is a co-respondent; and
(c) any other person given notice of the appeal may elect to become a co-
respondent.
(10) For an appeal under section 466—
(a) the responsible entity for making the change to which the appeal relates is the
respondent; and
{b) if the responsible entity is the assessment manager—
(i) if the appeal is started by a person who gave a notice under section 373 or
a pre-request response notice—the person who made the request for the
change is a co-respondent; and
(ii) any other person given notice of the appeal may elect to become a co-
respondent.
(11) For an appeal under section 467, the respondent is the entity given notice of the
appeal.
488 How an entity may elect to be a co-respondent
An entity that is entitled to elect tobe a Co-respondent to an appeal may do so,
within 10 business days after notice of the appeal is given to the entity, by following
the rules of court for the election.
490 Lodging appeal stops particular actions
(1) If an appeal, other than an appeal under section 465, 466 or 467, is started under
division 8, the development must not be started until the appeal is decided or
withdrawn.
(2) If an appeal is about a condition imposed on a compliance permit, the development
must not be started until the appeal is decided or withdrawn.
(3) Despite subsections (1) and (2), if the court is satisfied the outcome of the appeal
would not be affected if the development or part of the developmentis started
woes —= === before the-appeal is-decided, the court mayallow the development or part of the
development to start before the appeal is decided.
Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning Page 11 of 3
Page 30 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 31
152006.862.02
Page 31 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
[OCR of page images]
152006.862.02
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
20067862
Su nshine Coast Referral Agency Conditions |
Regional Council | INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 & 1998 REGULATION
‘SCRE CORRESPONDENCE
NUR
Assessment Manager Ref 2006/8662
AppleantReference 00510 LOB LF
DERM Reterence Ico7osNaMoo1s NooTe2 _ $0086636 Queensland
Government
410 February 2010
Chief Executive Officer
Sunshine Coast Regional Councit Eihronntent and Resource
Locked Bag 72 Management
Sunshine Coast Mail Centre Qld 4560
Attention: Monkeith Kadhum
Dear Sir/Madam
APPLICATION FOR RECONFIGURING A LOT OVER LOT 26 SP104706, 1270
MCKINNON DRIVE, RINGTAIL CREEK —- SUNSHINE COAST REGIONAL COUNCIL —
REFERRAL AGENCY RESPONSE .
The Chief Executive of the Department of Environment and Resource Management
(DERM) advises*hat the Referral Agengy Response for the above mentioned application,
prepared pursuant to section 3 3 16 of the /ntegrated Planning Act 1997 (IPA), is enclosed
A copy of the Referral Agency Response has been sent to the applicant
DERM issued a Notice for Consideration of Land Surrender dated 20 May 2009 which
suspended the IPA time-frame This Response effectively restarts the {time-frame from date
of issue :
DERM looks forward to receiving a copy of the Decision Notice for the application in dus
course
Should you have any questions, please contact Kern Milner on 5451 2256, quoting
reference number {CO706NAM0013
Yours sincerely
ae
Daniel Leo
AlSenior Officer (Planning and Development)
Nambour — South East Region
Authonsed Delegate
Encl Referral Agency Response
Department of Envsonment and Resource
Management
Gentenary Squave Busdng,
Curne Stat, Nentbour O 4550
PO Box 873, Nambour Q 4550
Yelophono + 61 7 6451 2222
Facsimle + 61 7 645 2260
Website ww derm ald gov au
ABN 83 705 639 586
10 of 24
Page 31 of 36
Page 32
152006.862.02
Page 32 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
[OCR of page images]
152006.862.02
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Department of Environment and Resource
Management (DERM) — Referral agency response
Given under Section 3 3 16 of the Integrated Planning Act 1997 (Qid) for the
Vegation Management Act 1999
1. Application dotaile
Appheant's mame Jo Franz.
4 Property description Lot 26 on SP104706
13 Development type Reconfigaring a Lot (Ral)
14 Assessment manager Sunshine Coast Regronal Council
15 Assessment manager reference — 2006-862
16 Referral date 20 February 2009
17 DERM references eLVAS — 200600658
Trackjob — 1CO706NAM0013
2. Concurrence agency response —
Fhecvincfexecutiveo?
DERM directs the assessment manager totnctude the
following conditions many development approval giver for the application
~—~Aibresidences and-associated buildumes arto by setback forty metres or more
fronrtemnent-vegetation shown on the Annotated StePtan—
=~ Albneveaitotment-troomhries are to be setback ter metres or morc trom
Tennant vegetation shown on the Annoteted-Srte- Pierre
— This epprovaldees not provide any authority-inder-theFegetatior
Monagement Act 1999-and-the-tntegrated Planning det 1997 to-cleer
~vegetntion,
Clearing of native vegetation as a result of this reconfiguring a lot development must not
ocur on the land within fie area shown as Area A on Referral Agency Response
(Vegetation) Plan RARP-SPD-04 14-006764 unless the clearing s—
« Residential clearing as defined under the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009.
« Essential management clearing including firebreaks associated with new
infrastructure.
© One access track! driveway to service the single residence.
« By fire under the Fire and Rescue Service Act 1990 to reduce hazardous fuel loads or
an activity under the Fire and Rescue Service Act 1990, section 53, 68 or 69: or
© Where it's necessary to remove or reduce the imminent risk that the vegetation poses
to serous personal injury or damage to property.
Attachment: Referral Agency Response (Vegetation) Plan-RARP SPD-0414-006764
Page 32 of 36
Page 33
152006.862.02
Page 33 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
[OCR of page images]
152006.862.02
3. Reasons for the concurrence agency response :
Reeunfigurmng a fot Rats astgist 2007 (RAL Policy).
‘Fhe property supports large nrens of pemnant-yegeretion:
These areas-are shown on the cortified Regional Eeosyntem Map,
The removal of verctahon within there areas is regulated under-the authority of
+— ensure that filo cleanng of remnant-vegetation is net necessitated by the
prosurnty-oFfrastrwcture to it; and
—any development approval remeins-eonaisient with the RAL Polioy:
The reasons for the inclusion of these conditions are:
e To ensure that the development remains consistent with module § of the State
Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) 11 April 2014.
* The original conditions have been amended to allow residential clearing, firebreaks
and an access track in the mapped remnant vegetation.
Findings on material questions of fact
Pend ee ee nt eaten as shaun on te
Regulated Vegetation Management Map.
. Minor clearing of 0.4ha will occur in the of concem regional ecosystem 12.3.2
e Areview of the application finds that the proposed change wall comply wath all
performance outcomes in the SDAP module 8.
Evidence or other material on which the findings were based:
e Change of Existing Approval Application
« Onginal DNRM Concurrence Agency Response 2006/006583. including the
SDAP Module 8 version 1.2 dated 11 April 2014
Google Earth image dated 24 October 2013
ONRM land resource data—
Mosaic mga56 2013 ecw image
Dominant Soils, Slope and 100K Contours
fy
Page 33 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 34
152006.862.02
Page 34 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
[OCR of page images]
152006.862.02
Page 2 of 4
DERM ~ Referral Agency Response 2006/006583
5. Definitions
Underlined terms have been defined—Schedule A — Glossary
6, Delegated officer signature
Andrew Collins
Senior Vegetation Management Officer
South East Region, DERM
20 May 2009
Attachment 1 Schedule A — Glossary
Document Set ID: 19816636 Page 34 of 36
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 35
152006.862.02
Page 35 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
[OCR of page images]
152006.862.02
Document Set ID: 19816636
20067862
Schedule A — Glossary
Clearing, for vegetation
* means remove, cut down, ringbark, push over, poison or destroy in any way
including by buming, flooding or draining, but
s does not include destroying standing vegetation by stock, or lopping a tree
Regional Ecosystem means a vegetation community m a bioregion that 1s consistently
associated with a particular combination of geology, landform and soil
Regional ecosystem map—
regional ecosystem map means 4 map—
(a) certified by the chief executive as the regional ecosystem map for a particular’
area, and
(b) maintained by the department for the purpose of showing, for the area—
(i) remnant endangered regional ecosystems, and
(i!) remnant of concern regional ecosystems, and
(iti) remnant not of concer regional ecosystems, and
Gv) numbers that reference regional ecosystems.
A regional ecosystem map includes any amendment to the map included ina
schedule to the map and certified by the chief executive as an amendment to the
"map at the day the amendment 1s certified.
Regional ecosystem maps can be viewed at DERM offices or by accessing the
following mternet address:
http://Ayww.epa.qld.gov.an/pature_conservation/biodiversity/regional_ecosystems/in
troduction_and_status/Regional_Ecosystem_Maps/#lot
Remnant vegetation means the vegetation mapped as being within a regional
ecosystem shown on the regional ecosystem map.
Vegetation is a native tree, shrub or plant other than grasses and non-woody herbage
Page 4 of 4
13 of 24
Page 35 of 36
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Page 36
152006.862.02
Page 36 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
[OCR of page images]
152006.862.02
ed Reference Points
All GPS points continue sequentially when labels are not shown
Parcel
A
A
A
7089249,
7089161
7089186
7089217
7089202
7039174
7089163
497890
497906
497932
497576
7089172
7089152
7089113
7088727,
7089002 498003,
agsco1_| 7088757
497995,
A
A
A
A
A
A
a
A
a
A
A
A
A
A
A
a
a
A
A
A
24
sp108708
| 8
RERBHO
0
‘ 4s
AP2t6H0 Re2t8140
1
Re13«086
SCALE 1:5000 A3 paper size . si he The property boundaries shown on this plan are
SCALE @A3 pap Note: Derived erence pins ar Provided PROXIMATE ONLY. They are NOT an accurate
0 50 100 200 300 400 500 m assistin the location of the Referral representation of the legal boundaries.
Agency Response boundaries. Responsibility :
for locating these boundaries lies solely with - ir fe
Projection: UTM (MGA Zone 56) Datum: GDA94. the landholder and delegated contractor(s). Me ith Refertot Agana Posen, oe Sree ere 4
LEGEND
© Derived Reference Points for GPS Referral Agency Response (Vegetation) Plan
. Plan of all Area A in Lot 26 on SP104706
[| saunjectvots)
. Area A - specific conditions apply - see N Queersand
ZA Referral Agency Response SPD-0414-006764 sm
for details
CENTRE: GYMPIE REGION: SOUTH
LOCALITY OF RINGTAILCREEK LOCAL GOVT: NOOSA SHIRE RARP
Map Reference: 9445 Compiled from: DDB, PYMP & NRO Notes SPD-0414-006764
Fie Reference: VAS 2014/002464 Propared by: LNO Date: 19 May 2014 Sheet 1 of 1
Page 36 of 36
Document Set ID: 19816636
Version: 1, Version Date: 02/11/2014
Used in these records
_As Published -Change to Existing Approval & Extension to Relevant Period - 152006 862 02 - 1030538.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 6.5 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.