Skip to the record
NoosaWatch™: The source of truth.

Original source · versioned page text

Sealed Judgement

of 206

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file (118 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

Original PDF page 175, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.

The results demonstrate that the proposed treatment will achieve best practice objectives for
Southeast Queensland specified in the State Planning Policy 2017, namely:

     o   80% Total Suspended Solids reduction;
     o   60% Total Phosphorus reduction;
     o   45% Total Nitrogen reduction; and
     o   90% Gross Pollutants reduction



In this case, it is desirable to minimise the discharge of pollutants to match the pre-development
case. While the modelling indicates that the system will match the pre-development load for the
majority of parameters, the Total Nitrogen load discharged from the Site is greater in the post-
development case than the pre-development case.

Reviewing the results of modelling, it is considered that this could be affected by the default
discharge concentration from bioretention systems. It is also noted that the analysis is conservative
as it does not allow for the potential for exfiltration to occur. Table 4-5 presents the results obtained
with the use of an exfiltration rate of 115 mm/h. This rate was obtained by field testing completed
at the site.

By including exfiltration, the Total Nitrogen load reaches the pre-development load.

Based on this, it is considered that discharge from the Site is acceptable with respect to pre-
development and post-development loads.




                                                                              R.30199.001.03_SMP.docx | 23




                                                                                                             173
Log in to download the original file

Sealed Judgement.pdf · 118 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.