Original source · versioned page text
Sealed Judgement
Very large file (118 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Original PDF page 61, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
6.4 T REE R ETENTION V ALUE C HANGE
The reinspection carried out during June and July 2024, and March 2025, included a
reconsideration of the Retention Value for some trees due to the negative impact of the vine
and natural decline. 18 trees lost their High retention value designation and 32 trees their
Medium. There was an increase of 10 trees classed as Low, and 40 additional trees were
classified as Dead since 2022. Please note that the trees that were Dead in 2022 received a
Low retention value. This is illustrated in the tables below and Appendix 4.
Table 2: Retention Value Change to 2025
Retention Value 2022 2024 2025 Change since 2022
High 105 89 87 Reduction of 18
Medium 109 77 77 Reduction of 32
Low 28 47 38 Increase of 10
Dead 0 29 40 Increase of 40
Table 3: Breakdown of the number of trees with Retention Value change 2022 to 2025
Retention Value in 2022 Retention Value in 2025 Number of trees
High High 86
High Medium 9
High Low 4
High Dead 6
Medium Medium 69
Medium Low 23
Medium Dead 17
Low Low 11
Dead Dead NA
Low Dead 17
242
25_05_28_AR_RACV_RACV v NSC_Tree Retention Review_V10 Page 12 of 32
59
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.