Council archive · source document
Development Application Part 2 of 2 - Plan and Site photos - OPW13/0614
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Very large file (13.9 MB): may take a few minutes to open.
Performance outcomes I Acceptable outcomes Response I Comment I
development from wave overtopping and storm surge
inundation
(2) maintain or enhance coastal ecosystems and natural
features, such as mangroves and coastal wetlands,
between the development and tidal waters, where the
coastal ecosystems and natural features protect or
buffer communities and infrastructure from sea level
rise and impacts from storm tide inundation.
AND
A05.3 Redevelopment of built structures in the erosion N/A These works do not iiwolve the redevelopment of built
prone area within a coastal management district: structures in the erosion prone area and therefore A05.3 is
(1) avoids intensifying the use of the premises, or not applicable.
(2) demonstrates that any intensification of use will not
result in a significant increase in foreshore or bank
hardening due to:
(a) the presence of existing erosion control
structures on or adjacent to the property, or
(b) the existing necessity to install erosion control
structures to defend built structures on the
property from an imminent threat of coastal
erosion. ",
AND
A05.4 Development that is coastal protection work Achieved Following ongoing erosion issues these works involve the
involves: construction of a geotextile sand bag wall for the protection
(1) beach nourishment undertaken in accordance with a of the Noosa River Caravan Park.
program of beach nourishment works that source
sediment of a suitable quality and of a type and size
These works were completed under emergent works in
which match that of the native sediment usually found
accordance with Section 585 of the Sustainable Planning
at the location, or
Act 2009 which allows for tidal works to be constructed
(2) the construction of an erosion control structure, without a development approval in an emergency.
where it is demonstrated that installing an erosion
,.
control structure is the only feasible option for
protecting permanent structures from coastal erosion These works are considered to be temporary works for the
at those structures cannot be abandoned or relocated protection of the Noosa River Caravan Park. As such
in the event of coastal erosion occurring. RPEQ certification was not required.
Editor’s note: Applications for coastal protection work should be
supported by a report certified by an RPEQ that demonstrates
how the engineering solution sought by the work will be achieved.
Editor’s note: Applications for erosion control structures should
demonstrate the consideration of beach nourishment techniques,
and include a statement of why nourishment (in whole or part)
has not been adopted as the preferred means of controllinq the
State development assessment provisions Module 10 -
Coastal protection 21 June 2013 Page 4 of 15
10.1 Tidal works, or development in a coastal management district state code
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Development Application Part 2 of 2 - Plan and Site photos - OPW13/0614Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 13.9 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.