Original source · versioned page text
2014-04-28 General Committee Meeting Agenda Pages 65-200
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 28 APRIL 2014
Planning Scheme Section 3.2 & 3.4 of the Policy outlines matters for consideration when
Policy 23 - assessing proposals for towers. The most applicable points associated
Telecommunication with the assessment of this proposal are:
Towers
3.2 a) Loss of vegetation on steep slopes or ridgelines; or
3.2 b) Visual scaring or the degradation of views or vistas from the
major road network; or
3.2 c) Alteration to key landform and landscape characters such
that they become dominated by the facility.
3.4 d) Be positioned to minimise clutter of multiple facilities.
3.4 e) Impact on views to and from waterways, beaches and
riparian zones.
Clearing is required for the 80m2 lease area and associated 5m cleared
area surrounding the perimeter. This area was previously planted as pine
plantation, with the vegetation to be removed not significant, being
regrowth (6-10 years old).
The existing vegetation within the Lake Flat Road reserve and on the site
assists in screening the tower, so as not to degrade views from the major
road network and Lake Cootharaba, meeting the Outcomes of the Policy.
Infrastructure Uses The Code includes requirements around two central themes - Health &
Code Safety and Visual Amenity.
Health & Safety
The Specific Outcomes of the Code require the development to avoid
unacceptable risks to the environment or to personal and public safety.
The applicant has provided a summary of the maximum cumulative
radiofrequency (RF) and electromagnetic energy (EME) levels at ground
level emitted from the proposed tower, assuming full power usage. The
summary indicates the proposed tower will emit a maximum EME level
from the tower, which is 0.06% of the Australian Radiation Protection and
Nuclear Safety Agency’s (ARPANSA) regulated acceptable maximum
radiation public exposure limits.
Taking a precautionary approach to the sensitive issue concerning health
and safety over time, certification is to be provided by the
telecommunications carrier upon request. The certification must
demonstrate annual compliance with the Health & Safety requirements
compared to ARPANSA regulations.
Visual Amenity
Probable Solution 10.1 requires that the tower is not established in the
Detached Housing, Semi Attached Housing, Attached Housing or Visitor
Mixed Use zones. Probable Solution 10.3 also requires the tower not to
exceed 25m in the rural zone. The proposed 31m tower is located within
the Rural zone.
Page 69 of 200
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.